Today's hottest deals

Biostar A10N-9830E

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 14%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 52%
Yacht
Workstation
Workstation 11%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (30th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 70 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a below average single core score, this CPU can handle email, web browsing and audio/video playback but it will struggle to handle modern 3D games or workstation tasks such as video editing. Finally, with a gaming score of 40.3%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is below average.
Graphics28.7% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive35.7% is low SSD score. With a better SSD this system will boot faster, make applications more responsive and reduce IO wait times.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Very high background CPU (74%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
MotherboardBiostar A10N-9830E  (all builds)
Memory7.7 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.4 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit couleurs,
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20191230
Uptime12.6 Days
Run DateSep 28 '22 at 15:42
Run Duration121 Seconds
Run User FRA-User
Background CPU 74%
Watch Gameplay: 1050-Ti + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing below expectations (30th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD FX-9830P APU (2016 M.BR)
P0, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 3 GHz, turbo 3.2 GHz (avg)
Performing as expected (55th percentile)
40.3% Average
Memory 58.1
1-Core 53.8
2-Core 86.6
41% 66.2 Pts
4-Core 128
8-Core 150
18% 139 Pts
64-Core 152
9% 152 Pts
Poor: 25%
This bench: 40.3%
Great: 50%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1050-Ti-$59
Nvidia(10DE 1C82) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 1911 MHz, MLim: 1752 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 512.15
Performing below potential (59th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
28.7% Poor
Lighting 36.4
Reflection 38.1
Parallax 36.4
30% 37 fps
MRender 36.1
Gravity 37.9
Splatting 27.1
27% 33.7 fps
Poor: 27%
This bench: 28.7%
Great: 33%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
SSD_2.5"_512GB_InnovationIT_QLC 512GB
85GB free (System drive)
Firmware: S1128B0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 110 133 14 135 22 13 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (6th percentile)
35.7% Below average
Read 394
Write 252
Mixed 304
SusWrite 71.1
57% 255 MB/s
4K Read 15.7
4K Write 49.5
4K Mixed 0.2
50% 21.8 MB/s
DQ Read 90
DQ Write 8.3
DQ Mixed 0.3
13% 32.9 MB/s
Poor: 36%
This bench: 35.7%
Great: 100%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown TEAMGROUP-UD4-2666 1x16GB
1 of 4 slots used
16GB DIMM DDR4 2400 MHz clocked @ 2132 MHz
Performing below potential (1st percentile) - Ensure that the top XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
22.3% Poor
MC Read 9.3
MC Write 6.5
MC Mixed 7.4
22% 7.73 GB/s
SC Read 5.8
SC Write 4.2
SC Mixed 6.6
16% 5.53 GB/s
Latency 134
30% 134 ns
Poor: 32%
This bench: 22.3%
Great: 51%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical A10N-9830E Builds (Compare 58 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 7%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 43%
Speed boat
Workstation
Workstation 6%
Tree trunk

Motherboard: Biostar A10N-9830E

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 15% - Very poor Total price: $46
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark the gold standard for users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $169Nvidia RTX 4060 $296WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $135
Intel Core i5-12400F $111Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $345WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $84
Intel Core i5-13600K $225Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $350
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback