Today's hottest deals

MSI B450M-A PRO MAX (MS-7C52)

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 66%
Battle cruiser
Desktop
Desktop 88%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 63%
Destroyer
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (81st percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 19 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle typical workstation, and even moderate server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 86.1%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Graphics75.8% is a very good 3D score, it's the business. This GPU can handle recent 3D games at high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive100% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionWindows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.
SystemMicro-Star MS-7C52
MotherboardMSI B450M-A PRO MAX (MS-7C52)  (all builds)
Memory12 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.7 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit kleuren
OSWindows 11
BIOS Date20220723
Uptime0.1 Days
Run DateOct 01 '23 at 15:47
Run Duration116 Seconds
Run User NLD-User
Background CPU1%

 PC Performing above expectations (81st percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Ryzen 5 3600-$88
AM4, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 12 threads
Base clock 3.6 GHz, turbo 4 GHz (avg)
Performing above expectations (71st percentile)
86.1% Excellent
Memory 77.6
1-Core 142
2-Core 260
87% 160 Pts
4-Core 508
8-Core 860
83% 684 Pts
64-Core 1,044
65% 1,044 Pts
Poor: 73%
This bench: 86.1%
Great: 92%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia RTX 3050-$243
Nvidia(10DE 163E) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 2145 MHz, MLim: 3500 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 536.67
Performing above expectations (80th percentile)
75.8% Very good
Lighting 102
Reflection 88.2
Parallax 92.1
83% 94.2 fps
MRender 84.1
Gravity 75
Splatting 68.3
61% 75.8 fps
Poor: 68%
This bench: 75.8%
Great: 78%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
SSD_2.5"_512GB_InnovationIT_QLC 512GB
435GB free (System drive)
Firmware: W0302B0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 427 427 440 446 445 446 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (96th percentile)
100% Outstanding
Read 509
Write 437
Mixed 425
SusWrite 438
102% 453 MB/s
4K Read 30.8
4K Write 106
4K Mixed 25.1
135% 54 MB/s
DQ Read 262
DQ Write 344
DQ Mixed 34.3
101% 214 MB/s
Poor: 36%
This bench: 100%
Great: 100%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Adata 1x16GB
1 of 2 slots used
16GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2667 MHz
Performing above expectations (77th percentile)
51.8% Above average
MC Read 19.2
MC Write 17.5
MC Mixed 16.2
50% 17.6 GB/s
SC Read 18
SC Write 18.6
SC Mixed 17.1
51% 17.9 GB/s
Latency 85.5
47% 85.5 ns
Poor: 27%
This bench: 51.8%
Great: 59%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 0: 0P 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
0% 0% 0 71 60 165 23.8" 1920 1009 MSI9BA4 MSI G2412
Typical B450M-A PRO MAX (MS-7C52) Builds (Compare 5,358 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 78%
Battleship
Desktop
Desktop 86%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 73%
Battleship

Motherboard: MSI B450M-A PRO MAX (MS-7C52)

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 136% - Outstanding Total price: $286
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $170Nvidia RTX 4060 $285WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $144
Intel Core i5-12400F $112Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $375WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $75
Intel Core i5-13600K $245Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $350
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback