HP 250 G8 Notebook PC

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 6%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 67%
Battle cruiser
Workstation
Workstation 6%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing way above expectations (93rd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 7 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. This PC is likely operated by a technical master!
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 59.9%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is average.
Graphics0.84% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive224% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Sub-optimal background CPU (11%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
SystemHP 250 G8 Notebook PC  (all builds)
MotherboardHP 881D
Memory3.6 GB free of 8 GB @ 3.2 GHz
Display1366 x 768 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20211015
Uptime7.8 Days
Run DateSep 30 '22 at 09:45
Run Duration116 Seconds
Run User IND-User
Background CPU 11%

 PC Performing way above expectations (93rd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i3-1115G4
U3E1, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 3 GHz, turbo 3.65 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (88th percentile)
59.9% Above average
Memory 69
1-Core 136
2-Core 235
80% 147 Pts
4-Core 294
8-Core 299
40% 296 Pts
64-Core 292
18% 292 Pts
Poor: 37%
This bench: 59.9%
Great: 63%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Intel UHD Graphics
HP(103C 881D) 1GB
Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 30.0.101.2079
Relative performance (0th percentile)
0.84% Terrible
Lighting 0.9
Reflection 1.5
Parallax 1.3
1% 1.23 fps
MRender 1.6
Gravity 1.2
Splatting 1.1
1% 1.3 fps
Poor: 5%
This bench: 0.84%
Great: 11%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Nvme SAMSUNG MZVLQ512HBLU-00BH1 512GB
385GB free (System drive)
Firmware: HPS1NFAV Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 1415 1036 886 847 263 362 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (95th percentile)
224% Outstanding
Read 1,531
Write 1,390
Mixed 1,312
SusWrite 801
282% 1,259 MB/s
4K Read 48.5
4K Write 153
4K Mixed 65.6
239% 89.1 MB/s
DQ Read 1,040
DQ Write 759
DQ Mixed 871
658% 890 MB/s
Poor: 73%
This bench: 224%
Great: 224%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Micron 4ATF1G64HZ-3G2F1 1x8GB
1 of 2 slots used
8GB SODIMM DDR4 clocked @ 3200 MHz
Performing way above expectations (95th percentile)
43.3% Average
MC Read 14.9
MC Write 16.9
MC Mixed 12.5
42% 14.8 GB/s
SC Read 12.5
SC Write 18.7
SC Mixed 13.7
43% 15 GB/s
Latency 104
39% 104 ns
Poor: 24%
This bench: 43.3%
Great: 43%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical 250 G8 Notebook PC Builds (Compare 2,568 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 14%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 75%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 13%
Tree trunk

System: HP 250 G8 Notebook PC

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $175Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $150
Intel Core i5-13600K $234Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $388WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $90
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4070 $520Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $406
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback