HP Laptop 15s-fq2xxx

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 12%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 64%
Destroyer
Workstation
Workstation 11%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing way below expectations (17th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 83 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 56.2%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is average.
Graphics14% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Boot Drive72.9% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times.
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Sub-optimal background CPU (15%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
SystemHP Laptop 15s-fq2xxx  (all builds)
MotherboardHP 87FE
Memory0.4 GB free of 8 GB @ 3.2 GHz
DisplayЦвета: 1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20211015
Uptime10.2 Days
Run DateMay 11 '23 at 07:07
Run Duration113 Seconds
Run User ROU-User
Background CPU 15%

 PC Performing way below expectations (17th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i5-1135G7
U3E1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 2.4 GHz, turbo 3.75 GHz (avg)
Performing way below expectations (5th percentile)
56.2% Above average
Memory 42.5
1-Core 129
2-Core 230
70% 134 Pts
4-Core 386
8-Core 484
56% 435 Pts
64-Core 459
28% 459 Pts
Poor: 57%
This bench: 56.2%
Great: 77%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Intel Iris Xe
HP(103C 87FE) 1GB
Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 27.20.100.8935
Performing as expected (56th percentile)
14% Very poor
Lighting 19.6
Reflection 19.7
Parallax 23.5
16% 20.9 fps
MRender 17.8
Gravity 24.2
Splatting 0.1
10% 14 fps
Poor: 8%
This bench: 14%
Great: 20%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Nvme SAMSUNG MZVLQ512HBLU-00BH1 512GB
38GB free (System drive)
Firmware: HPS1NFAV Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 55 55 54 51 56 51 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (6th percentile)
72.9% Very good
Read 682
Write 58
Mixed 132
SusWrite 53.7
50% 231 MB/s
4K Read 24.5
4K Write 58
4K Mixed 25.6
101% 36 MB/s
DQ Read 467
DQ Write 60.1
DQ Mixed 87.5
109% 205 MB/s
Poor: 73%
This bench: 72.9%
Great: 224%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Samsung M471A5244CB0-CWE 2x4GB
2 of 2 slots used
8GB SODIMM DDR4 clocked @ 3200 MHz
Performing way below expectations (1st percentile)
40.4% Average
MC Read 14.4
MC Write 20.2
MC Mixed 11.7
44% 15.4 GB/s
SC Read 6
SC Write 14.5
SC Mixed 5.3
24% 8.6 GB/s
Latency 191
21% 191 ns
Poor: 59%
This bench: 40.4%
Great: 86%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical Laptop 15s-fq2xxx Builds (Compare 2,177 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 17%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 77%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 16%
Surfboard

System: HP Laptop 15s-fq2xxx

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $175Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $150
Intel Core i5-13600K $234Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $388WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $90
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4070 $520Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $406
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback