Today's hottest deals

Hasee CP65S

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing GPU
Gaming
Gaming 0%
Incomplete
Desktop
Desktop 0%
Incomplete
Workstation
Workstation 0%
Incomplete
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (32nd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 68 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 60.3%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Boot Drive86.1% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times.
Memory32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
High background CPU (28%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
SystemHasee CP65S  (all builds)
MotherboardHasee CP65S
Memory27.7 GB free of 32 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20150722
Uptime0 Days
Run DateOct 06 '22 at 09:10
Run Duration193 Seconds
Run User AUS-User
Background CPU 28%

 PC Performing below expectations (32nd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-4720HQ
SOCKET 0, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 2.6 GHz, turbo 3.1 GHz (avg)
Performing as expected (48th percentile)
60.3% Good
Memory 70.8
1-Core 89.8
2-Core 154
61% 105 Pts
4-Core 269
8-Core 423
43% 346 Pts
64-Core 429
26% 429 Pts
Poor: 31%
This bench: 60.3%
Great: 71%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 970M
Clevo(1558 6557) 3GB
Driver: nvldumdx.dll Ver. 31.0.15.1748
Relative performance n/a - atypical extreme
Poor: 25% Great: 33%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Seagate BarraCuda 120 SSD ZA1000CM10003 1TB
171GB free (System drive)
Firmware: STRSD013
SusWrite @10s intervals: 212 245 254 275 248 225 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (11th percentile)
86.1% Excellent
Read 446
Write 423
Mixed 422
SusWrite 243
86% 384 MB/s
4K Read 29.6
4K Write 61
4K Mixed 39.4
128% 43.3 MB/s
DQ Read 262
DQ Write 342
DQ Mixed 360
256% 321 MB/s
Poor: 79%
This bench: 86.1%
Great: 136%
Kingston SA400M8240G 240GB
49GB free
Firmware: SBFK62B3
SusWrite @10s intervals: 183 201 149 117 113 112 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (12th percentile)
47.7% Average
Read 366
Write 206
Mixed 256
SusWrite 146
54% 243 MB/s
4K Read 23.6
4K Write 17.2
4K Mixed 16.9
66% 19.2 MB/s
DQ Read 158
DQ Write 18.5
DQ Mixed 31.4
37% 69.2 MB/s
Poor: 37%
This bench: 47.7%
Great: 91%
Samsung 850 EVO M.2 250GB
70GB free
Firmware: EMT21B6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 212 194 168 159 154 153 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (11th percentile)
83% Excellent
Read 427
Write 428
Mixed 364
SusWrite 173
78% 348 MB/s
4K Read 30.7
4K Write 55.3
4K Mixed 39.3
126% 41.8 MB/s
DQ Read 374
DQ Write 337
DQ Mixed 352
265% 354 MB/s
Poor: 73%
This bench: 83%
Great: 122%
Seagate ST2000LM007-1R8174 2TB
322GB free
Firmware: SBK2
SusWrite @10s intervals: 113 116 120 119 117 119 MB/s
Performing above expectations (62nd percentile)
52.4% Above average
Read 64.2
Write 111
Mixed 57
SusWrite 117
64% 87.4 MB/s
4K Read 0.8
4K Write 4.2
4K Mixed 0.7
189% 1.9 MB/s
Poor: 22%
This bench: 52.4%
Great: 67%
Seagate ST2000LM007-1R8174 2TB
364GB free
Firmware: EB01
SusWrite @10s intervals: 16 16 16 16 19 21 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - RAM cached drive detected
Poor: 22% Great: 67%
HP External HDD 2TB
75GB free, PID 4607
Operating at USB 2.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 31 34 34 34 35 34 MB/s
Performing above expectations (72nd percentile)
18.7% Very poor
Read 52.9
Write 32
Mixed 24.6
SusWrite 33.6
45% 35.8 MB/s
4K Read 1.2
4K Write 1.1
4K Mixed 0.7
66% 1 MB/s
Poor: 11%
This bench: 18.7%
Great: 22%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Kingston 99U5428-018.A00LF 99U5428-078.A00LF 99U5428-018.A00LF 99U5428-078.A00LF 32GB
1600, 1600, 1600, 1600 MHz
8192, 8192, 8192, 8192 MB
Performing below potential (10th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
49.5% Average
MC Read 18.6
MC Write 18.8
MC Mixed 14.9
50% 17.4 GB/s
SC Read 12.4
SC Write 16.8
SC Mixed 16
43% 15.1 GB/s
Latency 99.5
40% 99.5 ns
Poor: 49%
This bench: 49.5%
Great: 54%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical CP65S Builds (Compare 18 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 5%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 54%
Yacht
Workstation
Workstation 5%
Tree trunk

System: Hasee CP65S

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $170Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $118
Intel Core i5-12400F $112Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $380WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $75
Intel Core i5-13600K $248Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $350
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback