Gigabyte GA-970-GAMING

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 11%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 73%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 9%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (80th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 20 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 66.1%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics29.8% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive74.4% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times.
Memory4GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and although it's sufficient for most games, some will benefit from up to 8GB of RAM. 4GB is also enough for modest file and system caches which allow for a responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
MotherboardGigabyte GA-970-GAMING  (all builds)
Memory2.1 GB free of 4 GB @ 0.8 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20160406
Uptime1 Days
Run DateOct 29 '17 at 08:07
Run Duration113 Seconds
Run User ROU-User
Background CPU1%

 PC Performing above expectations (80th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD FX-6300-$90
CPU 1, 1 CPU, 3 cores, 6 threads
Base clock 3.5 GHz, turbo 3.65 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (99th percentile)
66.1% Good
Memory 92.7
1-Core 71.7
2-Core 131
62% 98.6 Pts
4-Core 219
8-Core 290
32% 255 Pts
64-Core 292
18% 292 Pts
Poor: 44%
This bench: 66.1%
Great: 62%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1050-$82
MSI(1462 3355) 2GB
CLim: 1923 MHz, MLim: 1752 MHz, Ram: 2GB, Driver: 388.0
Performing way above expectations (100th percentile)
29.8% Poor
Lighting 38.1
Reflection 25.4
Parallax 31.7
31% 31.7 fps
MRender 36.4
Gravity 32.6
Splatting 32.1
27% 33.7 fps
Poor: 24%
This bench: 29.8%
Great: 28%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 650 120GB
15GB free (System drive)
Firmware: FXT01B0Q Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s
Performing above expectations (64th percentile)
74.4% Very good
Read 471
Write 412
Mixed 460
100% 448 MB/s
4K Read 27.8
4K Write 54.7
4K Mixed 19.8
96% 34.1 MB/s
DQ Read 30.7
DQ Write 44.4
DQ Mixed 16.7
18% 30.6 MB/s
Poor: 40%
This bench: 74.4%
Great: 84%
Toshiba P300 1TB-$32
377GB free
Firmware: MS2OA8J0 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s
Performing below expectations (40th percentile)
81.2% Excellent
Read 157
Write 127
Mixed 104
96% 129 MB/s
4K Read 0.45
4K Write 1.58
4K Mixed 0.18
68% 0.74 MB/s
Poor: 52%
This bench: 81.2%
Great: 107%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Kingston HyperX DDR3 2400 C11 1x4GB
1 of 4 slots used
4GB DIMM DDR3 800 MHz clocked @ 933 MHz
Performing way above expectations (95th percentile)
31.9% Below average
MC Read 12.7
MC Write 9
MC Mixed 8.4
29% 10 GB/s
SC Read 11.6
SC Write 7.7
SC Mixed 8.8
27% 9.37 GB/s
Latency 62.7
64% 62.7 ns
Poor: 16%
This bench: 31.9%
Great: 32%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical GA-970-GAMING Builds (Compare 331 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 22%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 67%
Battle cruiser
Workstation
Workstation 18%
Surfboard

Motherboard: Gigabyte GA-970-GAMING

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 80% - Very good Total price: $217
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $175Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $150
Intel Core i5-13600K $234Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $388WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $90
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4070 $520Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $406
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback