Today's hottest deals

Asus X75VD

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 7%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 58%
Gunboat
Workstation
Workstation 7%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (69th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 31 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 57.4%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is average.
Graphics3.17% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive81.9% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times.
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Sub-optimal background CPU (17%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
SystemAsus X75VD  (all builds)
MotherboardASUSTeK X75VD
Memory4.6 GB free of 8 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display1600 x 900 - 32 Bit couleurs
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20120820
Uptime0 Days
Run DateOct 08 '22 at 00:46
Run Duration138 Seconds
Run User FRA-User
Background CPU 17%

 PC Performing above expectations (69th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i5-3210M-$52
SOCKET 0, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 2.5 GHz, turbo 2.9 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (99th percentile)
57.4% Above average
Memory 83.8
1-Core 75.5
2-Core 134
60% 97.6 Pts
4-Core 183
8-Core 183
24% 183 Pts
64-Core 187
12% 187 Pts
Poor: 31%
This bench: 57.4%
Great: 57%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Intel HD 4000 (Mobile 1.25 GHz)
Asus(1043 14C7) 2.5GB
Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 10.18.10.4252
Performing as expected (55th percentile)
3.17% Terrible
Lighting 3.9
Reflection 1.6
Parallax 2.7
3% 2.73 fps
MRender 4.2
Gravity 2.3
Splatting 4.7
3% 3.73 fps
Poor: 2%
This bench: 3.17%
Great: 4%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
PNY CS900 480GB-$38
393GB free (System drive)
Firmware: CS900Z13
SusWrite @10s intervals: 409 417 418 408 400 401 MB/s
Performing as expected (52nd percentile)
81.9% Excellent
Read 354
Write 399
Mixed 351
SusWrite 409
86% 378 MB/s
4K Read 23.6
4K Write 50.1
4K Mixed 27.8
98% 33.8 MB/s
DQ Read 227
DQ Write 337
DQ Mixed 190
169% 251 MB/s
Poor: 47%
This bench: 81.9%
Great: 102%
PNY U3 1TB
884GB free, PID 5678
Operating at USB 3.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 110 111 111 111 109 111 MB/s
Performing as expected (49th percentile)
43.7% Average
Read 105
Write 106
Mixed 32
SusWrite 110
117% 88.4 MB/s
4K Read 0.5
4K Write 1.4
4K Mixed 0.6
70% 0.83 MB/s
Poor: 15%
This bench: 43.7%
Great: 212%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Elpida EBJ40UG8BBU0-GN-F 04CB AM1L16BC4R1-B1GS 8GB
1600, 1600 MHz
4096, 4096 MB
Performing way above expectations (91st percentile)
50.6% Above average
MC Read 17.9
MC Write 18.2
MC Mixed 16.6
50% 17.6 GB/s
SC Read 14.6
SC Write 14.5
SC Mixed 14.6
42% 14.6 GB/s
Latency 73.7
54% 73.7 ns
Poor: 25%
This bench: 50.6%
Great: 51%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical X75VD Builds (Compare 119 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 3%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 49%
Yacht
Workstation
Workstation 2%
Tree trunk

System: Asus X75VD

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 59% - Above average Total price: $99
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark the gold standard for users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $165Nvidia RTX 4060 $295WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $135
Intel Core i5-12400F $111Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $389WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $85
Intel Core i5-13600K $200Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $350
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback