Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming 0% Incomplete	Desktop 0% Incomplete	Workstation 0% Incomplete


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing as expected (40th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 60 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle light workstation, and even some light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 79.6%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics	76.3% is a very good 3D score, it's the business. This GPU can handle recent 3D games at high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Memory	32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS Version	Windows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.

PC Performing as expected (40^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Xeon E3-1245 v6 562 User benchmarks, average bench 82% LGA1151, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads Base clock 3.7 GHz, turbo 3.9 GHz (avg) Performing below expectations (37^th percentile)	79.6% Very good	Memory 90 1-Core 115 2-Core 217 81% 141 Pts	4-Core 373 8-Core 598 60% 486 Pts	64-Core 596 37% 596 Pts
Poor: 72% ↑ This bench: 79.6% Great: 89%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia RTX 3050-$230 43,922 User benchmarks, average bench 75% Nvidia(10DE 2507) ≥ 4GB CLim: 2100 MHz, MLim: 3500 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 517.48 Performing below potential (75^th percentile) - GPU OC Guide	76.3% Very good	Lighting 104 Reflection 85.5 Parallax 91.2 85% 93.5 fps	MRender 85.8 Gravity 73 Splatting 66 60% 74.9 fps
Poor: 69% ↑ This bench: 76.3% Great: 79%

Drives	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Sandisk PLUS 1000GB 44,528 User benchmarks, average bench 44% 780GB free (System drive) Firmware: UH4504RL Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete	Read 412 Write 75.8 Mixed 54.5 38% 181 MB/s	4K Read 18.4 4K Write 37 4K Mixed 13 64% 22.8 MB/s	DQ Read 110 DQ Write 71.3 DQ Mixed 28.8 38% 69.9 MB/s
Poor: 28% Great: 58%
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016)-$39 1,120,098 User benchmarks, average bench 92% 919GB free Firmware: CC43 Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete	Read 200 Write 172 Mixed 80.9 111% 151 MB/s	4K Read 1 4K Write 1.7 4K Mixed 1 184% 1.23 MB/s
Poor: 60% Great: 113%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Unknown LD4AU008G-H3200GST 4x8GB 35 User benchmarks, average bench 87% 4 of 4 slots used 32GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2400 MHz Performing below potential (9^th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP	74.5% Very good	MC Read 26.4 MC Write 29 MC Mixed 23.7 75% 26.4 GB/s	SC Read 15 SC Write 30.2 SC Mixed 21.7 64% 22.3 GB/s	Latency 67.2 60% 67.2 ns
Poor: 74% ↑ This bench: 74.5% Great: 102%

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

Gaming 13%

Tree trunk

Desktop 79%

Battleship

Workstation 13%

Tree trunk

CPU
Xeon E3-1245 v6IntelBench 82%, 562 samples	2x

GPU
GeForce GT 710NvidiaBench 3%, 187,161 samples	1x
RTX 3050Nvidia $230Bench 75%, 43,922 samples	1x

SSD
CT1000P3SSD8 1TBBench 268%, 44,174 samples	1x
PLUS 1000GBSandiskBench 44%, 44,528 samples	1x

RAM
LD4AU008G-H3200GST 4x8GBUnknownBench 87%, 35 samples	1x
CB16GU2666.C8ET 4x16GBCrucialBench 83%, 25 samples	1x

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $32	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16