MSI Z370 GAMING PRO CARBON AC (MS-7B45)

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 133%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 106%
UFO
Workstation
Workstation 124%
UFO
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (73rd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 27 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle typical workstation, and even moderate server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 99.5%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is excellent.
Graphics132% is an outstanding 3D score, it's the bee's knees. This GPU can handle almost all 3D games at very high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive203% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionWindows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.
SystemMicro-Star MS-7B45
MotherboardMSI Z370 GAMING PRO CARBON AC (MS-7B45)  (all builds)
Memory27.9 GB free of 32 GB @ 3.3 GHz
Display2560 x 1440 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 11
BIOS Date20210421
Uptime0.2 Days
Run DateOct 13 '22 at 04:37
Run Duration441 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU8%

 PC Performing above expectations (73rd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-8700K-$189
U3E1, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 12 threads
Base clock 3.7 GHz, turbo 5.05 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (96th percentile)
99.5% Outstanding
Memory 94.7
1-Core 153
2-Core 306
101% 185 Pts
4-Core 560
8-Core 907
90% 734 Pts
64-Core 1,167
72% 1,167 Pts
Poor: 76%
This bench: 99.5%
Great: 100%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1080-Ti-$499
Zotac(19DA 2471) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 2062 MHz, MLim: 3002 MHz, Ram: 11GB, Driver: 516.94
Performing way above expectations (92nd percentile)
132% Outstanding
Lighting 181
Reflection 298
Parallax 190
147% 223 fps
MRender 143
Gravity 187
Splatting 130
124% 153 fps
Poor: 109%
This bench: 132%
Great: 133%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Pcie SSD 1TB
858GB free (System drive)
Firmware: ECFM12.2 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 1413 1001 727 737 786 783 MB/s
Performing as expected (43rd percentile)
203% Outstanding
Read 1,444
Write 2,350
Mixed 1,673
SusWrite 908
361% 1,594 MB/s
4K Read 34.6
4K Write 91.1
4K Mixed 53.4
169% 59.7 MB/s
DQ Read 938
DQ Write 736
DQ Mixed 874
644% 849 MB/s
Poor: 112%
This bench: 203%
Great: 284%
Samsung 970 Evo Plus NVMe PCIe M.2 2TB-$158
1.5TB free
Firmware: 2B2QEXM7 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 2151 2173 2204 1945 1370 1395 MB/s
Performing as expected (44th percentile)
329% Outstanding
Read 2478
Write 2,192
Mixed 1,826
SusWrite 1,873
470% 2,092 MB/s
4K Read 55.9
4K Write 116
4K Mixed 75.7
243% 82.5 MB/s
DQ Read 1,010
DQ Write 748
DQ Mixed 898
666% 885 MB/s
Poor: 223%
This bench: 329%
Great: 435%
SSK Storage 512GB
137GB free
Firmware: 1.00
SusWrite @10s intervals: 654 796 798 798 796 802 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - RAM cached drive detected
Poor: 46% Great: 85%
Samsung 970 Evo Plus NVMe PCIe M.2 2TB-$158
1TB free
Firmware: 2B2QEXM7 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 2303 2280 2304 1844 1413 1418 MB/s
Performing as expected (49th percentile)
331% Outstanding
Read 2,489
Write 2,280
Mixed 1,898
SusWrite 1,927
483% 2,149 MB/s
4K Read 56.2
4K Write 117
4K Mixed 73.3
241% 82.1 MB/s
DQ Read 1,012
DQ Write 746
DQ Mixed 901
668% 886 MB/s
Poor: 223%
This bench: 331%
Great: 435%
Pcie SSD 1TB
929GB free
Firmware: ECFM12.2 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 2400 1101 1048 1035 1009 1033 MB/s
Performing above expectations (67th percentile)
236% Outstanding
Read 1,476
Write 2078
Mixed 1,659
SusWrite 1271
367% 1,621 MB/s
4K Read 39.4
4K Write 97.7
4K Mixed 57.2
185% 64.8 MB/s
DQ Read 1,076
DQ Write 821
DQ Mixed 991
730% 963 MB/s
Poor: 112%
This bench: 236%
Great: 284%
6TB free, PID 0567
Operating at USB 3.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 168 168 170 167 168 169 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (92nd percentile)
79.8% Very good
Read 165
Write 182
Mixed 124
SusWrite 168
218% 160 MB/s
4K Read 2.1
4K Write 6.1
4K Mixed 1.5
266% 3.23 MB/s
Poor: 11%
This bench: 79.8%
Great: 80%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown F4-3200C16-8GTZRX 04CD F4-3200C16-8GTZB 04CD F4-3200C16-8GTZRX 04CD F4-3200C16-8GTZB 32GB
3333, 3333, 3333, 3333 MHz
8192, 8192, 8192, 8192 MB
Performing way above expectations (100th percentile)
108% Outstanding
MC Read 40.6
MC Write 42.4
MC Mixed 32.7
110% 38.6 GB/s
SC Read 22.1
SC Write 45.7
SC Mixed 32.1
95% 33.3 GB/s
Latency 57.9
69% 57.9 ns
Poor: 102%
This bench: 108%
Great: 108%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical Z370 GAMING PRO CARBON AC (MS-7B45) Builds (Compare 2,010 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 112%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 96%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation
Workstation 102%
UFO

Motherboard: MSI Z370 GAMING PRO CARBON AC (MS-7B45) - $210

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 75% - Very good Total price: $1,096
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $168Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $150
Intel Core i5-13600K $234Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $390WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $90
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4070 $520Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $406
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback