Wortmann_ag TERRA_SERVER

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 31%
Sail boat
Desktop
Desktop 72%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 31%
Sail boat
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (40th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 60 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle moderate workstation, and even light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 68.7%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics37.1% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive88.5% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times.
Memory32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
SystemWortmann_ag TERRA_SERVER  (all builds)
MotherboardIntel S2600CWR
Memory27.6 GB free of 32 GB @ 2.4 GHz
Display1280 x 720 - 32 Bit couleurs,
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20170628
Uptime0 Days
Run DateOct 15 '22 at 11:12
Run Duration125 Seconds
Run User FRA-User
Background CPU1%

 PC Performing below expectations (40th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Xeon E5-2650 v4
CPU1, 1 CPU, 12 cores, 24 threads
Base clock 2.2 GHz, turbo 2.35 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (86th percentile)
68.7% Good
Memory 78.5
1-Core 72
2-Core 139
58% 96.4 Pts
4-Core 317
8-Core 626
56% 472 Pts
64-Core 1,192
74% 1,192 Pts
Poor: 58%
This bench: 68.7%
Great: 71%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD RX 580-2048SP
AMD(1002 0B31) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 1206 MHz, MLim: 1500 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 22.20.27.02
Performing below potential (23rd percentile) - GPU OC Guide
37.1% Below average
Lighting 43.7
Reflection 58.8
Parallax 74.1
36% 58.9 fps
MRender 54.5
Gravity 53.4
Splatting 41.7
40% 49.9 fps
Poor: 33%
This bench: 37.1%
Great: 47%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 750 EVO 250GB-$130
150GB free (System drive)
Firmware: MAT01B6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 316 206 197 211 208 189 MB/s
Performing below expectations (30th percentile)
88.5% Excellent
Read 476
Write 449
Mixed 344
SusWrite 221
83% 372 MB/s
4K Read 32
4K Write 57.4
4K Mixed 39.5
130% 43 MB/s
DQ Read 368
DQ Write 330
DQ Mixed 326
251% 342 MB/s
Poor: 63%
This bench: 88.5%
Great: 114%
Avago MR9363-4i 600GB
82GB free
Firmware: 4.68
SusWrite @10s intervals: 39 13 14 13 12 13 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
50.1% Above average
Read 155
Write 92.8
Mixed 97.2
SusWrite 17.4
68% 90.7 MB/s
4K Read 3.3
4K Write 4.2
4K Mixed 2.4
482% 3.3 MB/s
Poor: 50%
This bench: 50.1%
Great: 83%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Samsung M393A1G40EB1-CRC 4x8GB
4 of 16 slots used
32GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2400 MHz
Performing below potential (20th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
66.7% Good
MC Read 30
MC Write 24
MC Mixed 21.6
72% 25.2 GB/s
SC Read 11.5
SC Write 12.8
SC Mixed 15.9
38% 13.4 GB/s
Latency 83.4
48% 83.4 ns
Poor: 59%
This bench: 66.7%
Great: 115%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical TERRA_SERVER Builds (Compare 18 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 12%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 61%
Destroyer
Workstation
Workstation 12%
Tree trunk

System: Wortmann_ag TERRA_SERVER

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 10% - Very poor Total price: $130
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $160Nvidia RTX 4060 $290WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $150
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $388WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $79
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4070 $520Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $363
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback