PC Status | Overall this PC is performing below expectations (40th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 60 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas. |
Processor | With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle moderate workstation, and even light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 68.7%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average. |
Graphics | 37.1% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics) |
Boot Drive | 88.5% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times. |
Memory | 32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing. |
OS Version | Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option. |
System | Wortmann_ag TERRA_SERVER (all builds) |
Motherboard | Intel S2600CWR |
Memory | 27.6 GB free of 32 GB @ 2.4 GHz |
Display | 1280 x 720 - 32 Bit couleurs, |
OS | Windows 10 |
BIOS Date | 20170628 |
Uptime | 0 Days |
Run Date | Oct 15 '22 at 11:12 |
Run Duration | 125 Seconds |
Run User | FRA-User |
Background CPU | 1% |
Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).
Processor | Bench | Normal | Heavy | Server |
---|---|---|---|---|
![]() Intel Xeon E5-2650 v4
CPU1, 1 CPU, 12 cores, 24 threads
Base clock 2.2 GHz, turbo 2.35 GHz (avg)
|
68.7%
Good
|
58% 96.4 Pts
|
56% 472 Pts
|
74% 1,192 Pts
|
Graphics Card | Bench | 3D DX9 | 3D DX10 | 3D DX11 |
---|---|---|---|---|
![]() AMD RX 580-2048SP
AMD(1002 0B31) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 1206 MHz, MLim: 1500 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 22.20.27.02
Performing below potential (23rd percentile) - GPU OC Guide |
37.1%
Below average
|
36% 58.9 fps
|
40% 49.9 fps
|
|
Drives | Bench | Sequential | Random 4k | Deep queue 4k |
---|---|---|---|---|
![]() Samsung 750 EVO 250GB-$130
150GB free (System drive)
Firmware: MAT01B6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 316 206 197 211 208 189 MB/s
|
88.5%
Excellent
|
83% 372 MB/s
|
130% 43 MB/s
|
251% 342 MB/s
|
![]() Avago MR9363-4i 600GB
82GB free
Firmware: 4.68
SusWrite @10s intervals: 39 13 14 13 12 13 MB/s
|
50.1%
Above average
|
68% 90.7 MB/s
|
482% 3.3 MB/s
|
|
Memory Kit | Bench | Multi core | Single core | Latency |
---|---|---|---|---|
![]() Samsung M393A1G40EB1-CRC 4x8GB
4 of 16 slots used
32GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2400 MHz
Performing below potential (20th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP |
66.7%
Good
|
72% 25.2 GB/s
|
38% 13.4 GB/s
|
48% 83.4 ns
|
L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
|
---|---|
Xeon E5-2650 v4IntelBench 66%, 1,056 samples | 5x |
Xeon E5-2620 v4IntelBench 68%, 1,471 samples | 3x |
CPU: Intel Xeon E5-2620 v31stBench 63%, 2,624 samples | 2x |
![]() |
|
---|---|
GeForce GT 710NvidiaBench 3%, 187,161 samples | 4x |
RTX 3050Nvidia $220Bench 74%, 82,770 samples | 3x |
GTX 1660S (Super)Nvidia $195Bench 71%, 428,800 samples | 2x |
EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER | Value: 10% - Very poor | Total price: $130 |