Wortmann_ag TERRA_SERVER

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 58%
Gunboat
Desktop
Desktop 69%
Battle cruiser
Workstation
Workstation 60%
Destroyer
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (42nd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 58 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle light workstation, and even some light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 66.5%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics83.5% is a very good 3D score, it's the business. This GPU can handle recent 3D games at high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive79.1% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times.
Memory32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
SystemWortmann_ag TERRA_SERVER  (all builds)
MotherboardIntel S2600CWR
Memory28.4 GB free of 32 GB @ 2.1 GHz
Display1280 x 768 - 32 Bit couleurs,
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20170628
Uptime0 Days
Run DateDec 14 '22 at 22:41
Run Duration125 Seconds
Run User FRA-User
Background CPU9%

 PC Performing as expected (42nd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Xeon E5-2650 v4
CPU1, 1 CPU, 12 cores, 24 threads
Base clock 2.2 GHz, turbo 2.35 GHz (avg)
Performing as expected (45th percentile)
66.5% Good
Memory 76.4
1-Core 49.3
2-Core 158
55% 94.7 Pts
4-Core 304
8-Core 622
54% 463 Pts
64-Core 1,208
75% 1,208 Pts
Poor: 58%
This bench: 66.5%
Great: 71%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia RTX 3050-$220
EVGA(3842 3551) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 2175 MHz, MLim: 3600 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 516.94
Performing way above expectations (100th percentile)
83.5% Excellent
Lighting 116
Reflection 92.8
Parallax 105
95% 105 fps
MRender 85.2
Gravity 75
Splatting 68
61% 76.1 fps
Poor: 68%
This bench: 83.5%
Great: 78%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 750 EVO 250GB-$130
30GB free (System drive)
Firmware: MAT01B6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 194 33 33 35 34 32 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (17th percentile)
79.1% Very good
Read 478
Write 449
Mixed 330
SusWrite 60.1
73% 329 MB/s
4K Read 32.5
4K Write 59
4K Mixed 39.6
131% 43.7 MB/s
DQ Read 377
DQ Write 317
DQ Mixed 324
249% 339 MB/s
Poor: 63%
This bench: 79.1%
Great: 114%
Avago MR9363-4i 600GB
26GB free
Firmware: 4.68
SusWrite @10s intervals: 90 88 93 88 93 84 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
83.2% Excellent
Read 197
Write 154
Mixed 97.7
SusWrite 89.3
99% 135 MB/s
4K Read 8
4K Write 4.9
4K Mixed 2.2
668% 5.03 MB/s
Poor: 50%
This bench: 83.2%
Great: 83%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Hynix HMA41GR7MFR8N-TF 4x8GB
4 of 16 slots used
32GB DIMM DDR4 2133 MHz clocked @ 1866 MHz
Performing below potential (7th percentile) - Ensure that the top XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
60.2% Good
MC Read 24.9
MC Write 22.2
MC Mixed 19.8
64% 22.3 GB/s
SC Read 11.4
SC Write 13.6
SC Mixed 16
39% 13.7 GB/s
Latency 87.4
46% 87.4 ns
Poor: 60%
This bench: 60.2%
Great: 121%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical TERRA_SERVER Builds (Compare 18 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 12%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 61%
Destroyer
Workstation
Workstation 12%
Tree trunk

System: Wortmann_ag TERRA_SERVER

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 10% - Very poor Total price: $130
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $160Nvidia RTX 4060 $290WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $150
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $388WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $79
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4070 $520Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $363
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback