Monster TULPAR T5 V4

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 6%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 45%
Yacht
Workstation
Workstation 6%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing way below expectations (19th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 81 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith an average single core score, this CPU can handle browsing the web, email, video playback and the majority of general computing tasks including light gaming when coupled with an appropriate GPU. Finally, with a gaming score of 47.4%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is below average.
Graphics1.3% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive83.2% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
CPU throttled at 59% by Windows. Ensure maximum processor state is set to 100% via Settings > System > Power & sleep > Additional power settings > Change plan settings > Change advanced power settings > Processor power management > Maximum processor state.
SystemMonster TULPAR T5 V4  (all builds)
MotherboardMONSTER TULPAR T5 V4
Memory12.1 GB free of 16 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit renk, , 1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit renk
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20141111
Uptime3 Days
Run DateOct 30 '17 at 20:53
Run Duration92 Seconds
Run User TUR-User
Background CPU9%
CPU Throttled 59%

 PC Performing way below expectations (19th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-4710HQ
SOCKET 0, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 2.5 GHz, turbo 1.5 GHz (avg)
Performing way below expectations (17th percentile)
47.4% Average
Memory 70.7
1-Core 43.2
2-Core 87.6
43% 67.2 Pts
4-Core 134
8-Core 179
20% 157 Pts
64-Core 212
13% 212 Pts
Poor: 31%
This bench: 47.4%
Great: 70%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Intel HD 4600 (Mobile 1.15 GHz)
Clevo(1558 6555) 1GB
Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 20.19.15.4531
Relative performance (0th percentile)
1.3% Terrible
Lighting 1.27
Reflection 11.5
Parallax 2.16
1% 4.99 fps
MRender 3.29
Gravity 0.8
Splatting 2.57
2% 2.22 fps
Poor: 2%
This bench: 1.3%
Great: 3%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Intel Raid 0 Volume 480GB
186GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 1.0.
Performing below expectations (33rd percentile)
83.2% Excellent
Read 701
Write 559
Mixed 385
121% 548 MB/s
4K Read 20.2
4K Write 31
4K Mixed 11.1
61% 20.8 MB/s
DQ Read 22.6
DQ Write 118
DQ Mixed 44.1
42% 61.7 MB/s
Poor: 54%
This bench: 83.2%
Great: 182%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Micron OEM MONSTER 2x8GB
2 of 4 slots used
16GB SODIMM DDR3 clocked @ 1600 MHz
Performing way below expectations (6th percentile)
48% Average
MC Read 19.5
MC Write 18.9
MC Mixed 16
52% 18.1 GB/s
SC Read 8.9
SC Write 6.6
SC Mixed 10.9
25% 8.8 GB/s
Latency 99.7
40% 99.7 ns
Poor: 48%
This bench: 48%
Great: 58%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical TULPAR T5 V4 Builds (Compare 8 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 7%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 55%
Gunboat
Workstation
Workstation 7%
Tree trunk

System: Monster TULPAR T5 V4

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 20% - Poor Total price: $40
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $164Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $150
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $89
Intel Core i5-13600K $245Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $359
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback