Monster TULPAR T5

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 9%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 68%
Battle cruiser
Workstation
Workstation 8%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing way above expectations (88th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 12 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. This PC is likely operated by a technical master!
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle very light workstation, and even some very light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 71.5%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics3.86% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive97.4% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Run History
SystemMonster TULPAR T5  (all builds)
MotherboardMonster TULPAR T5
Memory13 GB free of 16 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit renk
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20141201
Uptime0.2 Days
Run DateJan 20 '20 at 12:08
Run Duration126 Seconds
Run User TUR-User
Background CPU4%

 PC Performing way above expectations (88th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-4710MQ-$44
SOCKET 0, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 2.5 GHz, turbo 3.15 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (94th percentile)
71.5% Very good
Memory 81.3
1-Core 104
2-Core 204
74% 130 Pts
4-Core 337
8-Core 462
50% 399 Pts
64-Core 465
29% 465 Pts
Poor: 29%
This bench: 71.5%
Great: 73%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Intel HD 4600 (Mobile 1.15 GHz)
MSI(1462 1131) 1GB
Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 20.19.15.4835
Performing way above expectations (98th percentile)
3.86% Terrible
Lighting 3.9
Reflection 6.58
Parallax 6.34
3% 5.61 fps
MRender 8.76
Gravity 2.37
Splatting 7.57
5% 6.23 fps
Poor: 2%
This bench: 3.86%
Great: 3%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 750 EVO 250GB-$130
185GB free (System drive)
Firmware: MAT01B6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 323 204 219 205 180 189 MB/s
Performing as expected (51st percentile)
97.4% Outstanding
Read 497
Write 474
Mixed 304
SusWrite 220
84% 374 MB/s
4K Read 35.3
4K Write 80.9
4K Mixed 45.3
154% 53.8 MB/s
DQ Read 380
DQ Write 342
DQ Mixed 328
255% 350 MB/s
Poor: 63%
This bench: 97.4%
Great: 114%
HGST Travelstar 7K1000 2.5" 1TB
931GB free
Firmware: JB0OA3J0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 118 124 122 121 124 123 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (97th percentile)
76.4% Very good
Read 144
Write 135
Mixed 32.7
SusWrite 122
78% 109 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 1.7
4K Mixed 0.6
127% 1 MB/s
Poor: 35%
This bench: 76.4%
Great: 75%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Micron OEM MONSTER 2x8GB
2 of 4 slots used
16GB SODIMM DDR3 clocked @ 1600 MHz
Performing way above expectations (97th percentile)
57.6% Above average
MC Read 21.8
MC Write 20.8
MC Mixed 17.3
57% 20 GB/s
SC Read 16
SC Write 19.3
SC Mixed 19.9
53% 18.4 GB/s
Latency 78.1
51% 78.1 ns
Poor: 48%
This bench: 57.6%
Great: 58%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical TULPAR T5 Builds (Compare 28 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 8%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 57%
Gunboat
Workstation
Workstation 7%
Tree trunk

System: Monster TULPAR T5

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 99% - Outstanding Total price: $44
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $164Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $150
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $89
Intel Core i5-13600K $245Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $359
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback