Today's hottest deals

Valve Jupiter

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing GPU, SSD
Gaming
Gaming 0%
Incomplete
Desktop
Desktop 0%
Incomplete
Workstation
Workstation 0%
Incomplete
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (60th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 40 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 55.5%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is average.
Boot DriveThe boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
High background CPU (21%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
2 years ago, 2 years ago.
SystemValve Jupiter  (all builds)
MotherboardValve Jupiter
Memory11.1 GB free of 16 GB @ 4.3 GHz
Display800 x 1280 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20220524
Uptime0.1 Days
Run DateOct 18 '22 at 19:05
Run Duration106 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU 21%

 PC Performing above expectations (60th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Custom APU 0405
FP6, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 2.8 GHz, turbo 3.3 GHz (avg)
Performing below expectations (39th percentile)
55.5% Above average
Memory 42.5
1-Core 117
2-Core 227
66% 129 Pts
4-Core 368
8-Core 537
56% 453 Pts
64-Core 548
34% 548 Pts
Poor: 43%
This bench: 55.5%
Great: 64%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
SDXC 512GB
328GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 0001
SusWrite @10s intervals: 60 67 72 78 78 78 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (95th percentile)
46.4% Average
Read 86.6
Write 75.9
Mixed 63.3
SusWrite 72.2
55% 74.5 MB/s
4K Read 6.7
4K Write 4
4K Mixed 3.6
753% 4.77 MB/s
Poor: 10%
This bench: 46.4%
Great: 46%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown K3LK7K70BM-BGCP000 4x4GB
4 of 4 slots used
16GB 23h 4266 MHz clocked @ 5500 MHz
Performing as expected (46th percentile)
67.7% Good
MC Read 22.6
MC Write 23.7
MC Mixed 29.3
72% 25.2 GB/s
SC Read 15.4
SC Write 23.1
SC Mixed 20.7
56% 19.7 GB/s
Latency 191
21% 191 ns
Poor: 59%
This bench: 67.7%
Great: 72%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical Jupiter Builds (Compare 51 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 16%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 66%
Battle cruiser
Workstation
Workstation 15%
Surfboard

System: Valve Jupiter

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark the gold standard for users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $169Nvidia RTX 4060 $295WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $135
Intel Core i5-12400F $111Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $345WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $220Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $350
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback