Today's hottest deals

Valve Jupiter

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 13%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 57%
Gunboat
Workstation
Workstation 12%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (35th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 65 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a below average single core score, this CPU can handle email, web browsing and audio/video playback but it will struggle to handle modern 3D games or workstation tasks such as video editing. Finally, with a gaming score of 42.7%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is below average.
Graphics15.7% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive143% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionWindows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.
Run History
SystemValve Jupiter  (all builds)
MotherboardValve Jupiter
Memory8.1 GB free of 16 GB @ 4.3 GHz
Display800 x 1280 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 11
BIOS Date20221104
Uptime0.5 Days
Run DateFeb 21 '23 at 22:33
Run Duration128 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU1%

 PC Performing below expectations (35th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Custom APU 0405
FP6, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 2.8 GHz, turbo 3.2 GHz (avg)
Performing way below expectations (6th percentile)
42.7% Average
Memory 40.2
1-Core 93.7
2-Core 170
54% 101 Pts
4-Core 254
8-Core 293
36% 274 Pts
64-Core 344
21% 344 Pts
Poor: 43%
This bench: 42.7%
Great: 64%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD Custom GPU 0405
AMD(1002 0123) ≥ 4GB
Ram: 4GB, Driver: 22.20.19.06
Performing as expected (42nd percentile)
15.7% Very poor
Lighting 17.3
Reflection 24.9
Parallax 31.1
14% 24.4 fps
MRender 22
Gravity 20
Splatting 26.1
19% 22.7 fps
Poor: 15%
This bench: 15.7%
Great: 18%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
CNF30T5D100-512G 512GB
221GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 1.4.7.58
SusWrite @10s intervals: 1515 1533 1014 148 113 103 MB/s
Performing below expectations (35th percentile)
143% Outstanding
Read 925
Write 1452
Mixed 1,032
SusWrite 738
235% 1,037 MB/s
4K Read 29.2
4K Write 57.6
4K Mixed 29.7
113% 38.8 MB/s
DQ Read 762
DQ Write 429
DQ Mixed 234
271% 475 MB/s
Poor: 61%
This bench: 143%
Great: 185%
SDXC 513GB
170GB free
Firmware: 0001
SusWrite @10s intervals: 41 43 39 44 45 45 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (93rd percentile)
41.2% Average
Read 101
Write 9.5
Mixed 20.4
SusWrite 42.8
32% 43.5 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 0
4K Mixed 0.2
51% 0.3 MB/s
Poor: 12%
This bench: 41.2%
Great: 41%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown MT62F1G32D4DR-031 WT 4x4GB
4 of 4 slots used
16GB 23h 4266 MHz clocked @ 5500 MHz
Performing way below expectations (1st percentile)
54.3% Above average
MC Read 16.9
MC Write 21.3
MC Mixed 22.9
58% 20.4 GB/s
SC Read 9.5
SC Write 19.8
SC Mixed 14.2
41% 14.5 GB/s
Latency 201
20% 201 ns
Poor: 67%
This bench: 54.3%
Great: 143%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical Jupiter Builds (Compare 51 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 16%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 66%
Battle cruiser
Workstation
Workstation 15%
Surfboard

System: Valve Jupiter

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark the gold standard for users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $169Nvidia RTX 4060 $295WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $135
Intel Core i5-12400F $111Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $345WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $220Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $350
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback