Today's hottest deals

Valve Jupiter

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 3%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 13%
Tree trunk
Workstation
Workstation 3%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing way below expectations (7th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 93 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith an extremely low single core score, this CPU can barely handle email and light web browsing. Finally, with a gaming score of 5.45%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is terrible.
Graphics6.74% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Boot Drive22.1% is an extremely low SSD score, this system will benefit from a faster SSD.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionWindows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.
SystemValve Jupiter  (all builds)
MotherboardValve Jupiter
Memory7.2 GB free of 16 GB @ 4.3 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 11
BIOS Date20220820
Uptime0.1 Days
Run DateJun 20 '24 at 23:06
Run Duration506 Seconds
Run User PRI-User
Background CPU4%

 PC Performing way below expectations (7th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Custom APU 0405
FP6, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 2.8 GHz, turbo 0.4 GHz (avg)
Performing way below expectations (0th percentile)
5.45% Terrible
Memory 9.85
1-Core 2.5
2-Core 3.4
4% 5.25 Pts
4-Core 6.2
8-Core 8.6
1% 7.4 Pts
64-Core 10.6
1% 10.6 Pts
Poor: 43%
This bench: 5.45%
Great: 64%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD Custom GPU 0405
AMD(1002 0123) ≥ 4GB
Ram: 4GB, Driver: 22.40.33.02
Relative performance (0th percentile)
6.74% Terrible
Lighting 4
Reflection 5.6
Parallax 5.8
3% 5.13 fps
MRender 5.3
Gravity 19.8
Splatting 21.5
14% 15.5 fps
Poor: 15%
This bench: 6.74%
Great: 18%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Kingston OM3PDP3512B-A01 512GB
298GB free (System drive)
Firmware: EDFK0S03
SusWrite @10s intervals: 162 122 163 130 127 154 MB/s
Relative performance (0th percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable
22.1% Poor
Read 256
Write 260
Mixed 277
SusWrite 143
53% 234 MB/s
4K Read 4.3
4K Write 4.4
4K Mixed 1.6
11% 3.43 MB/s
Poor: 77%
This bench: 22.1%
Great: 196%
SDXC 513GB
258GB free
Firmware: 0001
SusWrite @10s intervals: 8.1 12 11 8.8 9.5 6.4 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (14th percentile)
11.5% Very poor
Read 30.5
Write 13.2
Mixed 16.7
SusWrite 9.2
13% 17.4 MB/s
4K Read 1
4K Write 1
4K Mixed 1
171% 1 MB/s
Poor: 12%
This bench: 11.5%
Great: 41%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown K3LK7K70BM-BGCP000 4x4GB
4 of 4 slots used
16GB 23h 4266 MHz clocked @ 5500 MHz
Relative performance (0th percentile)
15.3% Very poor
MC Read 5.6
MC Write 5.8
MC Mixed 6.9
17% 6.1 GB/s
SC Read 1.4
SC Write 2.2
SC Mixed 1.5
5% 1.7 GB/s
Latency 413
10% 413 ns
Poor: 59%
This bench: 15.3%
Great: 72%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 0: 0P 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
0% 0% 0 17 2 60 23.8" 1280 720 DELD0DA DELL P2419H
Typical Jupiter Builds (Compare 51 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 16%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 66%
Battle cruiser
Workstation
Workstation 15%
Surfboard

System: Valve Jupiter

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark the gold standard for users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $169Nvidia RTX 4060 $295WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $135
Intel Core i5-12400F $111Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $345WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $220Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $350
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback