Intel H61

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 20%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 68%
Battle cruiser
Workstation
Workstation 16%
Surfboard
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (31st percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 69 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 57.9%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is average.
Graphics29.4% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive58.6% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
High background CPU (23%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
MotherboardIntel H61  (all builds)
Memory5.6 GB free of 8 GB @ 0 GHz
Display1366 x 768 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20210726
Uptime0 Days
Run DateOct 19 '22 at 12:06
Run Duration116 Seconds
Run User IND-User
Background CPU 23%
Watch Gameplay: 1050-Ti + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing below expectations (31st percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i5-3470S
SOCKET 0, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 2.9 GHz, turbo 3.2 GHz (avg)
Performing way below expectations (13th percentile)
57.9% Above average
Memory 70.5
1-Core 86.3
2-Core 168
62% 108 Pts
4-Core 264
8-Core 261
35% 262 Pts
64-Core 275
17% 275 Pts
Poor: 52%
This bench: 57.9%
Great: 74%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1050-Ti-$59
CLim: 2012 MHz, MLim: 1752 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 522.25
Performing below potential (59th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
29.4% Poor
Lighting 36.9
Reflection 40.5
Parallax 38.9
30% 38.8 fps
MRender 37.9
Gravity 39.2
Splatting 28.2
28% 35.1 fps
Poor: 27%
This bench: 29.4%
Great: 33%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
512gb EVM SSD 512GB
399GB free (System drive)
Firmware: V0718B0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 153 217 216 229 234 234 MB/s
Performing below potential (21st percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable
58.6% Above average
Read 211
Write 197
Mixed 64.3
SusWrite 214
38% 171 MB/s
4K Read 26.1
4K Write 56.5
4K Mixed 20.1
95% 34.2 MB/s
DQ Read 204
DQ Write 191
DQ Mixed 36.9
72% 144 MB/s
Poor: 48%
This bench: 58.6%
Great: 97%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Samsung M378B5273DH0-CH9 0D9B 8GB
0, 0 MHz
4096, 4096 MB
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
40.3% Average
MC Read 14.2
MC Write 14.7
MC Mixed 13.2
40% 14 GB/s
SC Read 8.7
SC Write 14.1
SC Mixed 12.8
34% 11.9 GB/s
Latency 100
40% 100 ns
Poor: 40%
This bench: 40.3%
Great: 49%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical H61 Builds (Compare 10,362 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 8%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 60%
Gunboat
Workstation
Workstation 7%
Tree trunk

Motherboard: Intel H61

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 72% - Very good Total price: $87
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $160Nvidia RTX 4060 $290WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $150
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $388WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $79
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4070 $520Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $363
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback