Today's hottest deals

Lenovo 81ST

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 2%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 34%
Sail boat
Workstation
Workstation 2%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (29th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 71 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a relatively low single core score, this CPU can handle email, light web browsing and basic audio/video playback, but it will struggle to handle CPU intensive tasks. Finally, with a gaming score of 31.4%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is poor.
Graphics0.9% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive104% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times.
Memory4GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and although it's sufficient for most games, some will benefit from up to 8GB of RAM. 4GB is also enough for modest file and system caches which allow for a responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Very high background CPU (69%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
SystemLenovo 81ST  (all builds)
MotherboardLENOVO LNVNB161216
Memory0.8 GB free of 4 GB @ 2.1 GHz
Display1366 x 768 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20220222
Uptime7.7 Days
Run DateOct 21 '22 at 06:40
Run Duration141 Seconds
Run User IDN-User
Background CPU 69%

 PC Performing below expectations (29th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD A9-9425 APU (2016 M.SR)
Socket FS1r2, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 2 threads
Base clock 3.1 GHz, turbo 3.25 GHz (avg)
Performing above expectations (69th percentile)
31.4% Below average
Memory 50.7
1-Core 41.9
2-Core 53.9
32% 48.8 Pts
4-Core 73.1
8-Core 70.2
10% 71.6 Pts
64-Core 67.1
4% 67.1 Pts
Poor: 9%
This bench: 31.4%
Great: 39%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD Radeon R5 Graphics
Legend(17AA 3A2B) 512MB
Ram: 512MB, Driver: 20.10.32
Relative performance (0th percentile)
0.9% Terrible
Lighting 1
Reflection 9.8
Parallax 1.5
1% 4.1 fps
MRender 1.4
Gravity 0.5
Splatting 1.8
1% 1.23 fps
Poor: 2%
This bench: 0.9%
Great: 4%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Nvme V-GEN03MA22SCY25 256GB
188GB free (System drive)
Firmware: H220303a Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 562 376 608 397 242 294 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (6th percentile)
104% Outstanding
Read 920
Write 778
Mixed 797
SusWrite 413
163% 727 MB/s
4K Read 30.3
4K Write 48
4K Mixed 34.8
116% 37.7 MB/s
DQ Read 164
DQ Write 120
DQ Mixed 126
98% 137 MB/s
Poor: 104%
This bench: 104%
Great: 201%
WD WD10SPZX-00HKTT0 1TB
356GB free
Firmware: 05.01A05
SusWrite @10s intervals: 72 74 72 73 73 72 MB/s
Performing below expectations (29th percentile)
46.8% Average
Read 90
Write 74.4
Mixed 50.8
SusWrite 72.5
53% 71.9 MB/s
4K Read 0.9
4K Write 2.7
4K Mixed 0.7
165% 1.43 MB/s
Poor: 26%
This bench: 46.8%
Great: 79%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Samsung M471A5244CB0-CTD 1x4GB
1 of 1 slots used
4GB SODIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2133 MHz
Performing below potential (14th percentile) - ensure that an XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
17.5% Very poor
MC Read 5.4
MC Write 5.7
MC Mixed 6.2
16% 5.77 GB/s
SC Read 5.1
SC Write 5.4
SC Mixed 5.8
16% 5.43 GB/s
Latency 158
25% 158 ns
Poor: 15%
This bench: 17.5%
Great: 41%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical 81ST Builds (Compare 103 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 2%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 34%
Sail boat
Workstation
Workstation 2%
Tree trunk

System: Lenovo 81ST

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark the gold standard for users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $159Nvidia RTX 4060 $280WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $135
Intel Core i5-13600K $210Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $389WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $84
Intel Core i5-12400F $111Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $370
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback