Today's hottest deals

Standard AHV

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 8%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 55%
Yacht
Workstation
Workstation 7%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (30th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 70 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith an average single core score, this CPU can handle browsing the web, email, video playback and the majority of general computing tasks including light gaming when coupled with an appropriate GPU. Finally, with a gaming score of 53.9%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is average.
Graphics7.37% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Boot Drive64.4% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times.
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
High background CPU (29%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
24 months ago, 24 months ago.
SystemStandard AHV  (all builds)
MotherboardINTEL HURONRIVER
Memory5.7 GB free of 8 GB @ 1.3 GHz
Display1366 x 768 - 32 Bit cores, 1280 x 720 - 32 Bit cores
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20110209
Uptime0.1 Days
Run DateOct 22 '22 at 02:33
Run Duration148 Seconds
Run User BRA-User
Background CPU 29%

 PC Performing below expectations (30th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-2860QM-$469
CPU 1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 2.5 GHz, turbo 19,563,106 GHz (avg)
Performing way below expectations (17th percentile)
53.9% Above average
Memory 79.1
1-Core 54.7
2-Core 111
51% 81.7 Pts
4-Core 159
8-Core 220
24% 190 Pts
64-Core 226
14% 226 Pts
Poor: 31%
This bench: 53.9%
Great: 73%
Graphics Cards Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Intel HD 3000 (Mobile V2 1.3 GHz)
Device(1297 2020) 2GB
Driver: igdumd64.dll Ver. 9.17.10.4459
Performing as expected (55th percentile)
1.9% Terrible
Lighting 2.1
Reflection 2.5
Parallax 1.6
2% 2.07 fps
MRender 3
Gravity 2.6
Splatting 2.7
2% 2.77 fps
Poor: 1%
This bench: 1.9%
Great: 2%
Nvidia GTX 650-$112
Asus(1043 8440) 1GB
CLim: 1071 MHz, MLim: 1250 MHz, Ram: 1GB, Driver: 456.71
Performing way below expectations (4th percentile)
7.37% Terrible
Lighting 7.5
Reflection 11.8
Parallax 12.1
6% 10.5 fps
MRender 13.7
Gravity 12
Splatting 10.8
10% 12.2 fps
Poor: 8%
This bench: 7.37%
Great: 9%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
SSD 1TB 1TB
739GB free (System drive)
Firmware: FW210415
SusWrite @10s intervals: 32 194 198 247 182 240 MB/s
Performing below expectations (38th percentile)
64.4% Good
Read 462
Write 383
Mixed 334
SusWrite 182
76% 340 MB/s
4K Read 33.6
4K Write 50.5
4K Mixed 12.7
94% 32.3 MB/s
DQ Read 244
DQ Write 113
DQ Mixed 19.6
57% 125 MB/s
Poor: 35%
This bench: 64.4%
Great: 209%
SSD 512GB 512GB
211GB free
Firmware: FW200326
SusWrite @10s intervals: 365 358 377 370 345 358 MB/s
Performing as expected (57th percentile)
73.1% Very good
Read 461
Write 391
Mixed 326
SusWrite 362
86% 385 MB/s
4K Read 29.1
4K Write 52
4K Mixed 10.2
85% 30.4 MB/s
DQ Read 178
DQ Write 208
DQ Mixed 15.2
61% 134 MB/s
Poor: 38%
This bench: 73.1%
Great: 211%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
SNOAMOO BCS0-DJ-F 2x4GB
2 of 4 slots used
8GB SODIMM DDR3 1333 MHz
Performing way below expectations (7th percentile)
41.6% Average
MC Read 15.2
MC Write 14.7
MC Mixed 13.4
41% 14.4 GB/s
SC Read 11.1
SC Write 10.6
SC Mixed 12.4
32% 11.4 GB/s
Latency 82.2
49% 82.2 ns
Poor: 42%
This bench: 41.6%
Great: 51%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical AHV Builds (Compare 55 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 2%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 47%
Yacht
Workstation
Workstation 2%
Tree trunk

System: Standard AHV

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 56% - Above average Total price: $160
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $165Nvidia RTX 4060 $291WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $135
Intel Core i5-12400F $112Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $389WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $226Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $350
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback