Today's hottest deals

Philco 14E

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 7%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 57%
Gunboat
Workstation
Workstation 6%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (59th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 41 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 58.9%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is average.
Graphics2.09% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive63.3% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times.
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
SystemPhilco 14E  (all builds)
MotherboardPHILCO 14A5
Memory6.1 GB free of 8 GB @ 1.3 GHz
Display1366 x 768 - 32 Bit cores
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20110614
Uptime0 Days
Run DateOct 20 '20 at 21:09
Run Duration128 Seconds
Run User BRA-User
Background CPU4%

 PC Performing as expected (59th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-2860QM-$469
CPU 1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 2.5 GHz, turbo 19,104,180 GHz (avg)
Performing below expectations (26th percentile)
58.9% Above average
Memory 82.7
1-Core 86.2
2-Core 120
61% 96.4 Pts
4-Core 197
8-Core 252
29% 224 Pts
64-Core 257
16% 257 Pts
Poor: 31%
This bench: 58.9%
Great: 73%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Intel HD 3000 (Mobile V2 1.3 GHz)
Device(1297 2020) 2GB
Driver: igdumd64.dll Ver. 9.17.10.4229
Performing as expected (55th percentile)
2.09% Terrible
Lighting 2.3
Reflection 3.65
Parallax 1.53
2% 2.5 fps
MRender 3.38
Gravity 1.2
Splatting 4.22
2% 2.93 fps
Poor: 1%
This bench: 2.09%
Great: 2%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
SSD 512GB 512GB
451GB free (System drive)
Firmware: FW200326
SusWrite @10s intervals: 385 361 400 384 371 370 MB/s
Performing below expectations (35th percentile)
63.3% Good
Read 431
Write 380
Mixed 327
SusWrite 379
85% 379 MB/s
4K Read 12.2
4K Write 38.6
4K Mixed 8.9
50% 19.9 MB/s
DQ Read 172
DQ Write 196
DQ Mixed 15.1
58% 128 MB/s
Poor: 38%
This bench: 63.3%
Great: 211%
Samsung HM641JI 640GB-$50
380GB free
Firmware: 2AJ10001
SusWrite @10s intervals: 81 82 82 82 82 83 MB/s
Performing above expectations (83rd percentile)
45.5% Average
Read 76.9
Write 49.4
Mixed 50.5
SusWrite 81.8
48% 64.7 MB/s
4K Read 0.4
4K Write 1.1
4K Mixed 0.8
126% 0.77 MB/s
Poor: 15%
This bench: 45.5%
Great: 50%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
SNOAMOO BCS0-DJ-F 2x4GB
2 of 4 slots used
8GB SODIMM DDR3 1333 MHz
Performing way above expectations (96th percentile)
50.5% Above average
MC Read 18.2
MC Write 17.9
MC Mixed 15.9
50% 17.3 GB/s
SC Read 14.9
SC Write 16.5
SC Mixed 16
45% 15.8 GB/s
Latency 75.7
53% 75.7 ns
Poor: 42%
This bench: 50.5%
Great: 51%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical 14E Builds (Compare 9 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 6%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 57%
Gunboat
Workstation
Workstation 6%
Tree trunk

System: Philco 14E

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 53% - Above average Total price: $469
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $165Nvidia RTX 4060 $291WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $135
Intel Core i5-12400F $112Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $389WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $226Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $350
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback