Performance Results


Gaming 2% Tree trunk	Desktop 32% Sail boat	Workstation 2% Tree trunk


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing below expectations (27th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 73 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
Processor	With a relatively low single core score, this CPU can handle email, light web browsing and basic audio/video playback, but it will struggle to handle CPU intensive tasks. Finally, with a gaming score of 23.1%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very poor.
Graphics	4.82% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	71.9% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times.
Memory	4GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and although it's sufficient for most games, some will benefit from up to 8GB of RAM. 4GB is also enough for modest file and system caches which allow for a responsive system.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Very high background CPU (63%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

20 months ago, 20 months ago.

PC Performing below expectations (27^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i3-8130U 25,471 User benchmarks, average bench 48% U3E1, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 4 threads Base clock 2.2 GHz, turbo 3.1 GHz (avg) Performing way below expectations (7^th percentile)	23.1% Poor	Memory 14.2 1-Core 79.5 2-Core 136 38% 76.7 Pts	4-Core 178 8-Core 211 25% 195 Pts	64-Core 154 10% 154 Pts
Poor: 21% ↑ This bench: 23.1% Great: 64%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Intel UHD Graphics 620 (Mobile Kaby Lake R) 420,154 User benchmarks, average bench 5% Legend(17AA 3FDF) 1GB Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 31.0.101.2114 Performing above expectations (69^th percentile)	4.82% Terrible	Lighting 5.2 Reflection 1.7 Parallax 5.5 4% 4.13 fps	MRender 3.9 Gravity 4.6 Splatting 11.4 6% 6.63 fps
Poor: 3% ↑ This bench: 4.82% Great: 6%

Drive	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Nvme SAMSUNG MZALQ256 256GB 228 User benchmarks, average bench 138% 204GB free (System drive) Firmware: AL2QFXV7 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s SusWrite @10s intervals: 446 329 427 158 190 200 MB/s Performing way below expectations (6^th percentile)	71.9% Very good	Read 688 Write 533 Mixed 546 SusWrite 292 115% 515 MB/s	4K Read 16.6 4K Write 28.9 4K Mixed 20.4 67% 22 MB/s	DQ Read 168 DQ Write 91.1 DQ Mixed 120 92% 126 MB/s
Poor: 72% ↑ This bench: 71.9% Great: 194%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Smart Brazil SMS4TDC3C0K0446SCG 1x4GB 710 User benchmarks, average bench 35% 1 of 2 slots used 4GB SODIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2133 MHz Relative performance (0^th percentile)	13.6% Very poor	MC Read 4.8 MC Write 5.4 MC Mixed 4.9 14% 5.03 GB/s	SC Read 2.6 SC Write 3.9 SC Mixed 2.7 9% 3.07 GB/s	Latency 367 11% 367 ns
Poor: 28% ↑ This bench: 13.6% Great: 40%

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

Gaming 3%

Tree trunk

Desktop 51%

Yacht

Workstation 3%

Tree trunk

CPU
Core i3-8130UIntelBench 48%, 25,471 samples	133x

GPU
UHD Graphics 620 (Mobile Kaby Lake R)IntelBench 5%, 420,154 samples	132x
UHD Graphics 605IntelBench 5%, 6 samples	1x

SSD
MZALQ256HAJD-000L2 256GBSamsungBench 113%, 9,692 samples	7x
A400 240GBKingston $28Bench 66%, 424,288 samples	6x
SNVS250G 250GBKingstonBench 160%, 4,574 samples	4x

RAM
Brazil SMS4TDC3C0K0446SCG 1x4GBSmartBench 35%, 710 samples	64x
Brazil SMS4TDC3C0K0446SCG 2x4GBSmartBench 61%, 1,101 samples	16x
4ATF51264HZ-2G6E1 1x4GBMicronBench 32%, 18,494 samples	4x