Asus G73Jh

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 10%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 62%
Destroyer
Workstation
Workstation 8%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (55th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 45 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 59.4%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is average.
Graphics9.81% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Boot Drive52.2% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 7 is still a viable option, it's now 14 years and 10 months old. This system should be upgraded to Windows 10 which is generally faster and has an improved set of core utilities including better versions of explorer and task manager.
SystemAsus G73Jh  (all builds)
MotherboardASUSTeK G73Jh
Memory5 GB free of 8 GB @ 1.3 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 7
BIOS Date20100513
Uptime0 Days
Run DateOct 31 '17 at 20:26
Run Duration846 Seconds
Run User PRT-User
Background CPU2%

 PC Performing as expected (55th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7 Q 720-$220
Socket 989, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 1.6 GHz
Performing way above expectations (93rd percentile)
59.4% Above average
Memory 93
1-Core 70.8
2-Core 106
59% 89.8 Pts
4-Core 142
8-Core 216
22% 179 Pts
64-Core 208
13% 208 Pts
Poor: 30%
This bench: 59.4%
Great: 60%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD Mobility Radeon HD 5870
Asus(1043 1C02) 1GB
Driver: atiumd64.dll Ver. 8.683.0.0
Performing way above expectations (100th percentile)
9.81% Terrible
Lighting 12.7
Reflection 9.31
Parallax 10.7
10% 10.9 fps
MRender 8.86
Gravity 9.33
Splatting 12.7
9% 10.3 fps
Poor: 6%
This bench: 9.81%
Great: 9%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 840 Pro 512GB-$129
407GB free (System drive)
Firmware: DXM0 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s
Performing below potential (1st percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable
52.2% Above average
Read 264
Write 235
Mixed 226
54% 241 MB/s
4K Read 17.1
4K Write 28.9
4K Mixed 16.9
63% 21 MB/s
DQ Read 190
DQ Write 172
DQ Mixed 77.6
87% 147 MB/s
Poor: 66%
This bench: 52.2%
Great: 118%
Seagate Momentus 2.5" 500GB-$49
407GB free
Firmware: 0003 Max speed: SATA 2.0 300 MB/s
Performing as expected (41st percentile)
40% Average
Read 73
Write 66.4
Mixed 54.4
48% 64.6 MB/s
4K Read 0.41
4K Write 1.09
4K Mixed 0.33
74% 0.61 MB/s
Poor: 18%
This bench: 40%
Great: 58%
WD Elements 25A1 2TB
1TB free, PID 25a1
Operating at USB 2.1 Speed
Performing way below expectations (1st percentile)
6.2% Terrible
Read 21
Write 0.82
Mixed 1.02
6% 7.62 MB/s
4K Read 0.37
4K Write 0.94
4K Mixed 0.09
36% 0.47 MB/s
Poor: 14%
This bench: 6.2%
Great: 58%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Hynix HMT125S6TFR8C-H9 4x2GB
4 of 4 slots used
8GB SODIMM DDR3 1333 MHz
Performing way above expectations (94th percentile)
41.5% Average
MC Read 16.2
MC Write 12.5
MC Mixed 13.7
40% 14.1 GB/s
SC Read 10.1
SC Write 9.9
SC Mixed 10.7
29% 10.2 GB/s
Latency 62
64% 62 ns
Poor: 35%
This bench: 41.5%
Great: 42%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical G73Jh Builds (Compare 98 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 8%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 53%
Yacht
Workstation
Workstation 7%
Tree trunk

System: Asus G73Jh

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 54% - Above average Total price: $220
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $169Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $150
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $89
Intel Core i5-13600K $249Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $369
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback