Today's hottest deals

Lenovo 20EN0007MS

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 18%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 72%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 16%
Surfboard
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (58th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 42 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle very light workstation, and even some very light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 68.5%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics16.2% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive55% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionWindows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.
SystemLenovo 20EN0007MS  (all builds)
MotherboardLENOVO 20EN0007MS
Memory19.6 GB free of 32 GB @ 2.1 GHz
Display3840 x 2160 - 32 Bit kleuren
OSWindows 11
BIOS Date20220713
Uptime0.8 Days
Run DateOct 25 '22 at 10:18
Run Duration128 Seconds
Run User NLD-User
Background CPU2%

 PC Performing as expected (58th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-6820HQ
U3E1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 2.7 GHz, turbo 3.25 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (93rd percentile)
68.5% Good
Memory 79.8
1-Core 89.3
2-Core 167
66% 112 Pts
4-Core 310
8-Core 464
48% 387 Pts
64-Core 461
28% 461 Pts
Poor: 33%
This bench: 68.5%
Great: 70%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia Quadro M2000M
Legend(17AA 2230) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 1137 MHz, MLim: 1252 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 517.40
Performing above expectations (63rd percentile)
16.2% Very poor
Lighting 20
Reflection 17.1
Parallax 19.4
16% 18.8 fps
MRender 22.9
Gravity 22.1
Splatting 15.8
16% 20.3 fps
Poor: 14%
This bench: 16.2%
Great: 17%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Toshiba THNSNJ512GDNU A 512GB
326GB free (System drive)
Firmware: JYLA0103
SusWrite @10s intervals: 196 311 215 287 257 194 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (10th percentile)
55% Above average
Read 367
Write 295
Mixed 306
SusWrite 243
68% 303 MB/s
4K Read 12.6
4K Write 24.7
4K Mixed 17.9
55% 18.4 MB/s
DQ Read 156
DQ Write 211
DQ Mixed 70.9
85% 146 MB/s
Poor: 52%
This bench: 55%
Great: 97%
WD Elements 25A2 500GB
348GB free, PID 25a2
Operating at USB 3.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 74 74 74 74 74 74 MB/s
Performing above expectations (64th percentile)
32% Below average
Read 66.6
Write 73.2
Mixed 48.8
SusWrite 73.8
90% 65.6 MB/s
4K Read 0.5
4K Write 2
4K Mixed 0.8
97% 1.1 MB/s
Poor: 14%
This bench: 32%
Great: 57%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Samsung M471A1K43CB1-CRC Hynix HMA81GS6AFR8N-UH M471A1K43CB1-CRC Micron 8ATF1G64HZ-2G6E1 32GB
2133, 2133, 2133, 2133 MHz
8192, 8192, 8192, 8192 MB
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
68.8% Good
MC Read 24.8
MC Write 27.2
MC Mixed 22.2
71% 24.7 GB/s
SC Read 13.6
SC Write 25.3
SC Mixed 19.9
56% 19.6 GB/s
Latency 80.9
49% 80.9 ns
Poor: 68%
This bench: 68.8%
Great: 69%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical 20EN0007MS Builds (Compare 27 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 16%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 67%
Battle cruiser
Workstation
Workstation 15%
Tree trunk

System: Lenovo 20EN0007MS

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark the gold standard for users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $210Nvidia RTX 4060 $280WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $135
Intel Core i5-12600K $159Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $389WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $84
Intel Core i5-12400F $111Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $370
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback