Acer Extensa 215-54G

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 16%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 71%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 15%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (34th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 66 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 54.9%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is average.
Graphics19% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive170% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Sub-optimal background CPU (17%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
SystemAcer Extensa 215-54G  (all builds)
MotherboardTGL Jameson_TL
Memory10 GB free of 16 GB @ 3.2 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit renk,
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20220701
Uptime0 Days
Run DateOct 25 '22 at 17:39
Run Duration125 Seconds
Run User TUR-User
Background CPU 17%

 PC Performing below expectations (34th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i5-1135G7
U3E1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 2.4 GHz, turbo 3.15 GHz (avg)
Performing way below expectations (5th percentile)
54.9% Above average
Memory 50.1
1-Core 134
2-Core 218
72% 134 Pts
4-Core 324
8-Core 444
48% 384 Pts
64-Core 463
29% 463 Pts
Poor: 57%
This bench: 54.9%
Great: 77%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GeForce MX350
Acer(1025 1465) 2GB
Driver: nvldumdx.dll Ver. 31.0.15.2225
Performing above expectations (75th percentile)
19% Very poor
Lighting 24.9
Reflection 26.4
Parallax 25.7
20% 25.7 fps
MRender 18
Gravity 24.6
Splatting 18.4
16% 20.3 fps
Poor: 12%
This bench: 19%
Great: 21%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Nvme HFM512GD3JX016N 512GB
198GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 41020C20 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 749 747 708 760 802 799 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (9th percentile)
170% Outstanding
Read 1,377
Write 986
Mixed 1,052
SusWrite 761
234% 1,044 MB/s
4K Read 45
4K Write 83.8
4K Mixed 54
182% 60.9 MB/s
DQ Read 333
DQ Write 190
DQ Mixed 295
211% 273 MB/s
Poor: 159%
This bench: 170%
Great: 304%
WD Blue 2.5" 1TB (2004)-$45
706GB free
Firmware: 01.01A01
SusWrite @10s intervals: 69 74 75 73 74 74 MB/s
Performing as expected (48th percentile)
44.1% Average
Read 80.3
Write 71.8
Mixed 48.5
SusWrite 73.3
50% 68.5 MB/s
4K Read 0.5
4K Write 1.7
4K Mixed 0.7
130% 0.97 MB/s
Poor: 23%
This bench: 44.1%
Great: 62%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Kingston KVR32S22S8/8 Samsung M471A1G44BB0-CWE 16GB
3200, 3200 MHz
8192, 8192 MB
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
54.6% Above average
MC Read 21.9
MC Write 22.7
MC Mixed 17.7
59% 20.8 GB/s
SC Read 8.8
SC Write 17.5
SC Mixed 11
36% 12.4 GB/s
Latency 160
25% 160 ns
Poor: 55%
This bench: 54.6%
Great: 76%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical Extensa 215-54G Builds (Compare 60 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 14%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 77%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 12%
Tree trunk

System: Acer Extensa 215-54G

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $163Nvidia RTX 4060 $290WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $160
Intel Core i5-13600K $249Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $79
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4070 $520Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $383
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback