Acer Extensa 215-54G

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 18%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 81%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 17%
Surfboard
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (53rd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 47 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle light workstation, and even some light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 73.5%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics13.7% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Boot Drive191% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionWindows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.
Run History
SystemAcer Extensa 215-54G  (all builds)
MotherboardTGL Jameson_TL
Memory10 GB free of 16 GB @ 3.2 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit renk,
OSWindows 11
BIOS Date20220314
Uptime3.9 Days
Run DateFeb 21 '23 at 09:04
Run Duration112 Seconds
Run User TUR-User
Background CPU3%

 PC Performing as expected (53rd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i5-1135G7
U3E1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 2.4 GHz, turbo 3.85 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (87th percentile)
73.5% Very good
Memory 68.4
1-Core 140
2-Core 259
84% 156 Pts
4-Core 423
8-Core 622
65% 522 Pts
64-Core 570
35% 570 Pts
Poor: 57%
This bench: 73.5%
Great: 77%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Intel Iris Xe
Acer(1025 1464) 1GB
Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 30.0.101.1404
Performing as expected (56th percentile)
13.7% Very poor
Lighting 17.7
Reflection 26.7
Parallax 18.4
14% 20.9 fps
MRender 16.1
Gravity 17.6
Splatting 12.6
12% 15.4 fps
Poor: 8%
This bench: 13.7%
Great: 20%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Nvme HFM512GD3JX016N 512GB
273GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 41020C20 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 784 738 644 804 836 799 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (16th percentile)
191% Outstanding
Read 1,372
Write 1,395
Mixed 1,128
SusWrite 768
262% 1,166 MB/s
4K Read 48.9
4K Write 91.7
4K Mixed 62.6
203% 67.7 MB/s
DQ Read 873
DQ Write 294
DQ Mixed 550
415% 572 MB/s
Poor: 159%
This bench: 191%
Great: 304%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Kingston KVR32S22S8/8 Samsung M471A1G44BB0-CWE 16GB
3200, 3200 MHz
8192, 8192 MB
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
75.7% Very good
MC Read 28.5
MC Write 31.5
MC Mixed 22.5
79% 27.5 GB/s
SC Read 15.3
SC Write 36.1
SC Mixed 17.4
66% 22.9 GB/s
Latency 105
38% 105 ns
Poor: 55%
This bench: 75.7%
Great: 76%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical Extensa 215-54G Builds (Compare 60 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 14%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 77%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 12%
Tree trunk

System: Acer Extensa 215-54G

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $163Nvidia RTX 4060 $290WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $160
Intel Core i5-13600K $249Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $79
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4070 $520Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $383
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback