Medion Erazer X7853 MD60697

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 56%
Gunboat
Desktop
Desktop 75%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 47%
Yacht
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (52nd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 48 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle very light workstation, and even some very light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 69.5%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics75.6% is a very good 3D score, it's the business. This GPU can handle recent 3D games at high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive67.7% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times.
Memory32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
High background CPU (22%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
SystemMedion Erazer X7853 MD60697  (all builds)
MotherboardMEDION P670HSGM
Memory26.2 GB free of 32 GB @ 2.1 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20170223
Uptime0.1 Days
Run DateOct 30 '22 at 21:05
Run Duration125 Seconds
Run User DNK-User
Background CPU 22%

 PC Performing as expected (52nd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-7700HQ
U3E1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 2.8 GHz, turbo 3.4 GHz (avg)
Performing above expectations (82nd percentile)
69.5% Good
Memory 78.8
1-Core 90.1
2-Core 174
66% 114 Pts
4-Core 325
8-Core 500
51% 413 Pts
64-Core 516
32% 516 Pts
Poor: 38%
This bench: 69.5%
Great: 73%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1070 (Mobile)
Clevo(1558 67A4) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 1911 MHz, MLim: 2002 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 526.47
Performing below potential (74th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
75.6% Very good
Lighting 90.3
Reflection 121
Parallax 93.5
74% 102 fps
MRender 91.4
Gravity 95.1
Splatting 102
79% 96.1 fps
Poor: 48%
This bench: 75.6%
Great: 82%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
HFS256G39TND-N210A 256GB
146GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 30000P10
SusWrite @10s intervals: 204 217 252 212 239 206 MB/s
Performing as expected (44th percentile)
67.7% Good
Read 382
Write 217
Mixed 206
SusWrite 222
57% 257 MB/s
4K Read 21.8
4K Write 46.6
4K Mixed 21
85% 29.8 MB/s
DQ Read 343
DQ Write 253
DQ Mixed 182
167% 259 MB/s
Poor: 54%
This bench: 67.7%
Great: 83%
Seagate ST1000LM048-2E7172 1TB
314GB free
Firmware: SDM1
SusWrite @10s intervals: 56 60 62 63 63 63 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (8th percentile)
31.3% Below average
Read 46.5
Write 54.8
Mixed 42.5
SusWrite 61.2
38% 51.2 MB/s
4K Read 0.5
4K Write 4.8
4K Mixed 0.4
154% 1.9 MB/s
Poor: 29%
This bench: 31.3%
Great: 71%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Kingston KHX2400C14S4/8G Hynix HMA81GS6AFR8N-UH KHX2400C14S4/8G Hynix HMA81GS6AFR8N-UH 32GB
2133, 2133, 2133, 2133 MHz
8192, 8192, 8192, 8192 MB
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
68.8% Good
MC Read 24.9
MC Write 27.3
MC Mixed 22
71% 24.7 GB/s
SC Read 14.8
SC Write 25.4
SC Mixed 19.6
57% 19.9 GB/s
Latency 82.8
48% 82.8 ns
Poor: 66%
This bench: 68.8%
Great: 69%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical Erazer X7853 MD60697 Builds (Compare 6 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 49%
Yacht
Desktop
Desktop 70%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 41%
Speed boat

System: Medion Erazer X7853 MD60697

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $175Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $150
Intel Core i5-13600K $234Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $388WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $90
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4070 $520Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $406
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback