Today's hottest deals

Lenovo 82H9

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 7%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 45%
Speed boat
Workstation
Workstation 6%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (57th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 43 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a below average single core score, this CPU can handle email, web browsing and audio/video playback but it will struggle to handle modern 3D games or workstation tasks such as video editing. Finally, with a gaming score of 35.6%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is poor.
Graphics10.3% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Boot Drive44.3% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionWindows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.
Very high background CPU (100%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
2 years ago, 2 years ago.
SystemLenovo 82H9  (all builds)
MotherboardLENOVO LNVNB161216
Memory3.6 GB free of 8 GB @ 3.2 GHz
Display1600 x 900 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 11
BIOS Date20220115
Uptime0.1 Days
Run DateNov 07 '22 at 13:18
Run Duration128 Seconds
Run User GBR-User
Background CPU 100%

 PC Performing as expected (57th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Celeron 6305
U3E1, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 2 threads
Base clock 1.8 GHz, turbo 1.8 GHz (avg)
Performing above expectations (74th percentile)
35.6% Below average
Memory 62.5
1-Core 57.6
2-Core 52
40% 57.4 Pts
4-Core 55.9
8-Core 41.3
7% 48.6 Pts
64-Core 57.4
4% 57.4 Pts
Poor: 12%
This bench: 35.6%
Great: 42%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Intel UHD Graphics
Legend(17AA 3F9C) 1GB
Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 30.0.101.1692
Performing way above expectations (91st percentile)
10.3% Very poor
Lighting 11.7
Reflection 10.7
Parallax 14.4
10% 12.3 fps
MRender 14.4
Gravity 15
Splatting 13.9
12% 14.4 fps
Poor: 5%
This bench: 10.3%
Great: 11%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Nvme UMIS RPJTJ128MEE1MWX 128GB
82GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 2.1C0628 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 207 117 132 134 125 118 MB/s
Relative performance (0th percentile)
44.3% Average
Read 465
Write 219
Mixed 246
SusWrite 139
59% 267 MB/s
4K Read 12.9
4K Write 17.4
4K Mixed 12
44% 14.1 MB/s
DQ Read 108
DQ Write 54.2
DQ Mixed 147
91% 103 MB/s
Poor: 60%
This bench: 44.3%
Great: 177%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Samsung M471A5244CB0-CWE Hynix HMA851S6DJR6N-XN 8GB
3200, 3200 MHz
4096, 4096 MB
Performing below potential (5th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
35.4% Below average
MC Read 9.5
MC Write 17
MC Mixed 9.6
34% 12 GB/s
SC Read 11
SC Write 16.1
SC Mixed 9.3
35% 12.1 GB/s
Latency 121
33% 121 ns
Poor: 35%
This bench: 35.4%
Great: 70%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical 82H9 Builds (Compare 419 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 17%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 77%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 16%
Surfboard

System: Lenovo 82H9

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark the gold standard for users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12400F $111Nvidia RTX 4060 $290WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $130
Intel Core i5-12600K $164Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $389WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $78
Intel Core i5-13600K $210Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $389
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback