Today's hottest deals

Asus P7P55D

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 23%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 69%
Battle cruiser
Workstation
Workstation 19%
Surfboard
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (37th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 63 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 61%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics33.5% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive51.6% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Very high background CPU (51%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
MotherboardAsus P7P55D  (all builds)
Memory1.4 GB free of 8 GB @ 1.3 GHz
Display1920 x 1200 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20101214
Uptime2 Days
Run DateNov 04 '17 at 00:13
Run Duration141 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU 51%

 PC Performing below expectations (37th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core 860
LGA1156, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 2.8 GHz, turbo 2.9 GHz (avg)
Performing way below expectations (9th percentile)
61% Good
Memory 91.6
1-Core 63.3
2-Core 117
58% 90.6 Pts
4-Core 167
8-Core 317
29% 242 Pts
64-Core 341
21% 341 Pts
Poor: 61%
This bench: 61%
Great: 73%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD R9 380-$200
CLim: 990 MHz, MLim: 1425 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 17.10.3
Performing below potential (54th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
33.5% Below average
Lighting 41.5
Reflection 50.1
Parallax 51
34% 47.5 fps
MRender 48.2
Gravity 37.7
Splatting 36.4
33% 40.8 fps
Poor: 31%
This bench: 33.5%
Great: 35%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 840 Evo 250GB-$99
34GB free (System drive)
Firmware: EXT0DB6Q Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s
Performing below potential (2nd percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable
51.6% Above average
Read 261
Write 179
Mixed 185
46% 208 MB/s
4K Read 25.8
4K Write 37.8
4K Mixed 17.1
81% 26.9 MB/s
DQ Read 166
DQ Write 111
DQ Mixed 14.6
44% 97.1 MB/s
Poor: 64%
This bench: 51.6%
Great: 118%
WD Green 2TB (2012)-$53
416GB free
Firmware: 80.00A80 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s
Performing as expected (40th percentile)
60.1% Good
Read 102
Write 107
Mixed 97.8
77% 102 MB/s
4K Read 0.43
4K Write 1.93
4K Mixed 0.17
72% 0.84 MB/s
Poor: 40%
This bench: 60.1%
Great: 84%
WD Black 1TB (2010)-$60
254GB free
Firmware: 05.00K05 Max speed: SATA 2.0 300 MB/s
Performing as expected (46th percentile)
54.7% Above average
Read 105
Write 86.1
Mixed 89.2
70% 93.3 MB/s
4K Read 0.52
4K Write 1.78
4K Mixed 0.44
103% 0.91 MB/s
Poor: 35%
This bench: 54.7%
Great: 76%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown 8GB
1333, 1333, 1333, 1333 MHz
2048, 2048, 2048, 2048 MB
Performing above expectations (70th percentile)
38% Below average
MC Read 12.6
MC Write 13.1
MC Mixed 12.6
36% 12.8 GB/s
SC Read 8.8
SC Write 9.4
SC Mixed 11
28% 9.73 GB/s
Latency 64.7
62% 64.7 ns
Poor: 20%
This bench: 38%
Great: 51%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical P7P55D Builds (Compare 1,249 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 20%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 69%
Battle cruiser
Workstation
Workstation 16%
Surfboard

Motherboard: Asus P7P55D

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 91% - Outstanding Total price: $144
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark the gold standard for users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $159Nvidia RTX 4060 $270WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $135
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $380WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $84
Intel Core i5-13600K $210Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $350
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback