Today's hottest deals

Gigabyte GA-P55M-UD4

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming
Gaming 23%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 73%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 18%
Surfboard
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (81st percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 19 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 72.9%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics32% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Memory12GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 12GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 7 is still a viable option, it's now 15 years and 3 months old. This system should be upgraded to Windows 10 which is generally faster and has an improved set of core utilities including better versions of explorer and task manager.
High background CPU (25%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
5 years ago, 5 years ago.
MotherboardGigabyte GA-P55M-UD4  (all builds)
Memory8 GB free of 12 GB @ 1.3 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 7
BIOS Date20091203
Uptime0 Days
Run DateApr 25 '19 at 04:40
Run Duration145 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU 25%
Watch Gameplay: 1050-Ti + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing above expectations (81st percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core 860
Socket 1156, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 2.8 GHz
Performing way above expectations (91st percentile)
72.9% Very good
Memory 93.2
1-Core 81.4
2-Core 161
68% 112 Pts
4-Core 294
8-Core 363
42% 328 Pts
64-Core 370
23% 370 Pts
Poor: 61%
This bench: 72.9%
Great: 73%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1050-Ti-$59
CLim: 1974 MHz, MLim: 1752 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 430.39
Performing way above expectations (91st percentile)
32% Below average
Lighting 39.6
Reflection 31.8
Parallax 38.3
32% 36.6 fps
MRender 39.2
Gravity 39.1
Splatting 37.1
31% 38.5 fps
Poor: 27%
This bench: 32%
Great: 33%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Intel SSDSC2BB080G4 80GB
12GB free (System drive)
Firmware: D2010355
SusWrite @10s intervals: 39 42 43 41 43 45 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - RAM cached drive detected
Poor: 59% Great: 85%
WD Green 1TB (2009)-$105
539GB free
Firmware: 01.01A01
SusWrite @10s intervals: 67 68 70 69 70 70 MB/s
Performing as expected (57th percentile)
43.4% Average
Read 81.8
Write 81
Mixed 58.5
SusWrite 68.9
54% 72.6 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 2.2
4K Mixed 0.8
159% 1.23 MB/s
Poor: 23%
This bench: 43.4%
Great: 57%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown 12GB
null MHz
2048, 4096, 2048, 4096 MB
Performing above expectations (85th percentile)
42.7% Average
MC Read 15.9
MC Write 13.6
MC Mixed 12.8
40% 14.1 GB/s
SC Read 12.8
SC Write 12.7
SC Mixed 12.6
36% 12.7 GB/s
Latency 61.5
65% 61.5 ns
Poor: 20%
This bench: 42.7%
Great: 50%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical GA-P55M-UD4 Builds (Compare 43 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 7%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 58%
Gunboat
Workstation
Workstation 6%
Tree trunk

Motherboard: Gigabyte GA-P55M-UD4

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 50% - Average Total price: $120
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark the gold standard for users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $159Nvidia RTX 4060 $270WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $135
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $380WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $84
Intel Core i5-13600K $210Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $350
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback