Acer Aspire X1470

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming
Gaming 1%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 26%
Raft
Workstation
Workstation 1%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (27th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 73 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith an extremely low single core score, this CPU can barely handle email and light web browsing. Finally, with a gaming score of 30.2%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is poor.
Graphics2.49% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot DriveThe boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Very high background CPU (100%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
19 months ago, 19 months ago.
SystemAcer Aspire X1470  (all builds)
MotherboardAcer Aspire X1470
Memory7.8 GB free of 16 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display1920 x 1200 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20130318
Uptime4 Days
Run DateNov 14 '22 at 13:27
Run Duration122 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU 100%

 PC Performing below expectations (27th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD A6-3620 APU
P0, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 2.2 GHz, turbo 2.2 GHz (avg)
Performing way below expectations (5th percentile)
30.2% Below average
Memory 44.3
1-Core 20.3
2-Core 39.5
24% 34.7 Pts
4-Core 95.2
8-Core 93.9
13% 94.6 Pts
64-Core 110
7% 110 Pts
Poor: 31%
This bench: 30.2%
Great: 47%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD Radeon HD 6530D
Acer(1025 061D) 512MB
Driver: aticfx64.dll Ver. 15.201.1151.0
Performing below expectations (22nd percentile)
2.49% Terrible
Lighting 3
Reflection 3.8
Parallax 2.8
2% 3.2 fps
MRender 3.3
Gravity 2.4
Splatting 3.6
3% 3.1 fps
Poor: 2%
This bench: 2.49%
Great: 3%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
WD Blue 500GB (2010)-$23
377GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 17.01H17
SusWrite @10s intervals: 89 98 86 87 102 110 MB/s
Performing as expected (55th percentile)
55.8% Above average
Read 99
Write 73.2
Mixed 57.6
SusWrite 95.5
60% 81.3 MB/s
4K Read 0.4
4K Write 1.1
4K Mixed 0.6
104% 0.7 MB/s
Poor: 24%
This bench: 55.8%
Great: 69%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unifosa HU564404EP0200 Kingston KHX1600C10D3/4G Kingston KHX1600C10D3/4G 16GB
1600, 1600, 1333, 1600 MHz
4096, 4096, 4096, 4096 MB
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
25.5% Poor
MC Read 10.5
MC Write 9.8
MC Mixed 9.7
29% 10 GB/s
SC Read 2.6
SC Write 2.9
SC Mixed 3
8% 2.83 GB/s
Latency 183
22% 183 ns
Poor: 25%
This bench: 25.5%
Great: 33%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical Aspire X1470 Builds (Compare 15 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 7%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 43%
Speed boat
Workstation
Workstation 6%
Tree trunk

System: Acer Aspire X1470

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 12% - Very poor Total price: $28
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $160Nvidia RTX 4060 $290WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $150
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $388WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $79
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4070 $520Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $363
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback