Today's hottest deals

HP EliteBook 650 15.6 inch G9 Notebook PC

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 8%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 56%
Gunboat
Workstation
Workstation 9%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing way below expectations (15th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 85 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith an average single core score, this CPU can handle browsing the web, email, video playback and the majority of general computing tasks including light gaming when coupled with an appropriate GPU. Finally, with a gaming score of 51.5%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is average.
Graphics9.02% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Boot Drive66.5% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionWindows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.
Sub-optimal background CPU (14%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
SystemHP EliteBook 650 15.6 inch G9 Notebook PC  (all builds)
MotherboardHP 8AA9
Memory6.7 GB free of 16 GB @ 3.2 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 11
BIOS Date20220524
Uptime0 Days
Run DateNov 15 '22 at 15:12
Run Duration114 Seconds
Run User NLD-User
Background CPU 14%

 PC Performing way below expectations (15th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i5-1235U
U3E1, 1 CPU, 10 cores, 12 threads
Base clock 1.3 GHz, turbo 1.8 GHz (avg)
Performing below expectations (21st percentile)
51.5% Above average
Memory 7.03
1-Core 162
2-Core 304
74% 158 Pts
4-Core 510
8-Core 898
85% 704 Pts
64-Core 962
60% 962 Pts
Poor: 36%
This bench: 51.5%
Great: 83%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Intel UHD Graphics
HP(103C 8AA9) 1GB
Driver: <> Ver. 31.0.101.3358
Performing way below expectations (18th percentile)
9.02% Terrible
Lighting 11
Reflection 17.2
Parallax 12.9
9% 13.7 fps
MRender 16.1
Gravity 21.6
Splatting 0.3
9% 12.7 fps
Poor: 8%
This bench: 9.02%
Great: 17%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Crucial MTFDKBA256TFK-1BC1AABHA 256GB
177GB free (System drive)
Firmware: HPSV040
SusWrite @10s intervals: 533 460 416 339 296 566 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (5th percentile)
66.5% Good
Read 187
Write 311
Mixed 242
SusWrite 435
67% 294 MB/s
4K Read 23.7
4K Write 30.5
4K Mixed 19.7
77% 24.6 MB/s
DQ Read 306
DQ Write 96.8
DQ Mixed 227
161% 210 MB/s
Poor: 66%
This bench: 66.5%
Great: 257%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Hynix HMA82GS6DJR8N-XN 1x16GB
1 of 2 slots used
16GB SODIMM DDR4 clocked @ 3200 MHz
Performing way below expectations (17th percentile)
32.4% Below average
MC Read 9.6
MC Write 16.3
MC Mixed 12.1
36% 12.7 GB/s
SC Read 3.4
SC Write 11.9
SC Mixed 4.8
19% 6.7 GB/s
Latency 432
9% 432 ns
Poor: 26%
This bench: 32.4%
Great: 52%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical EliteBook 650 15.6 inch G9 Notebook PC Builds (Compare 192 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 13%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 72%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 12%
Tree trunk

System: HP EliteBook 650 15.6 inch G9 Notebook PC

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $170Nvidia RTX 4060 $285WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $146
Intel Core i5-12400F $112Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $375WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $75
Intel Core i5-13600K $252Nvidia RTX 4070 $278Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $350
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback