TEST
YOUR RAM
ADD TO PC
BUILD

Hynix

HMAA2GS6CJR8N-XN 1x16GB

▲ 500 ▼

Release date ≈ Q1 2021.

Average Bench: 44.1% (119th of 132)

Based on 4,293 user benchmarks.  Model: Hynix HMAA2GS6CJR8N-XN 1x16GB
Poor: 31%Average: 44.1% Great: 55%

Popular builds with this RAM

Below average average bench

The Hynix HMAA2GS6CJR8N-XN 1x16GB averaged 55.9% lower than the peak scores attained by the group leaders. This isn't a great result which indicates that there are much faster alternatives on the comparison list.

Strengths

Avg. 16 Core Read Bench 16.6GB/s
Avg. 16 Core Write Bench 16GB/s

Good consistency

The range of scores (95th - 5th percentile) for the Hynix HMAA2GS6CJR8N-XN 1x16GB is 24.1%. This is a relatively narrow range which indicates that the Hynix HMAA2GS6CJR8N-XN 1x16GB performs reasonably consistently under varying real world conditions.

Weaknesses

Avg. Physical RAM Latency 159ns
Avg. 1 Core Read Bench 11.9GB/s
ADVERTISEMENT

Average Bench

(Based on 4,293 samples)
Rank 11944.1%
Min Avg Max
11 MC Read 16.6 20.7
11.4 MC Write 16 20
9.87 MC Mixed 14.3 18.2
44.6% 15.6 GB/s
Min Avg Max
4.1 SC Read 11.9 17.4
9.57 SC Write 15.7 20.8
5.3 SC Mixed 12.8 18.1
38.4% 13.4 GB/s
Min Avg Max
84.9 Latency 159 278
25.1% 159 ns
User Benchmarks BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
The fastest RAM (mainstream) averages a speed of 100%
1 of 2 slots used
16GB SODIMM DDR4 clocked @ 3200 MHz
49.6% Average
MC Read 17.1
MC Write 14.6
MC Mixed 16.8
46% 16.2 GB/s
SC Read 19.7
SC Write 20.1
SC Mixed 19.4
56% 19.7 GB/s
Latency 80.1
50% 80.1 ns
1 of 2 slots used
16GB SODIMM DDR4 clocked @ 3200 MHz
49.3% Average
MC Read 19.4
MC Write 17.5
MC Mixed 16.6
51% 17.8 GB/s
SC Read 11
SC Write 18.9
SC Mixed 14.5
42% 14.8 GB/s
Latency 148
27% 148 ns
1 of 2 slots used
16GB SODIMM DDR4 clocked @ 3200 MHz
48.3% Average
MC Read 18.7
MC Write 16.5
MC Mixed 14.4
47% 16.5 GB/s
SC Read 14.6
SC Write 16.8
SC Mixed 16.1
45% 15.8 GB/s
Latency 85.5
47% 85.5 ns
1 of 2 slots used
16GB SODIMM DDR4 clocked @ 3200 MHz
48.2% Average
MC Read 16.9
MC Write 14.2
MC Mixed 16.4
45% 15.8 GB/s
SC Read 18.5
SC Write 18.5
SC Mixed 18.8
53% 18.6 GB/s
Latency 83.3
48% 83.3 ns
1 of 2 slots used
16GB SODIMM DDR4 clocked @ 3200 MHz
45.8% Average
MC Read 16.8
MC Write 12.5
MC Mixed 15.5
43% 14.9 GB/s
SC Read 19.4
SC Write 18.7
SC Mixed 16.3
52% 18.1 GB/s
Latency 85.1
47% 85.1 ns
1 of 2 slots used
16GB SODIMM DDR4 clocked @ 3200 MHz
40.4% Average
MC Read 14.1
MC Write 15.5
MC Mixed 14.7
42% 14.8 GB/s
SC Read 7.7
SC Write 13
SC Mixed 10.4
30% 10.4 GB/s
Latency 135
30% 135 ns
1 of 8 slots used
16GB SODIMM DDR4 clocked @ 3200 MHz
37.6% Below average
MC Read 14.1
MC Write 14.4
MC Mixed 11.8
38% 13.4 GB/s
SC Read 10.6
SC Write 14
SC Mixed 10.4
33% 11.7 GB/s
Latency 168
24% 168 ns
1 of 8 slots used
16GB SODIMM DDR4 clocked @ 3200 MHz
30.2% Below average
MC Read 10.9
MC Write 12.2
MC Mixed 9.8
31% 11 GB/s
SC Read 7.3
SC Write 8.9
SC Mixed 7
22% 7.73 GB/s
Latency 163
25% 163 ns
1 of 2 slots used
16GB SODIMM DDR4 clocked @ 3200 MHz
24.6% Poor
MC Read 9.1
MC Write 9
MC Mixed 8.5
25% 8.87 GB/s
SC Read 6.9
SC Write 7
SC Mixed 6.4
19% 6.77 GB/s
Latency 208
19% 208 ns
4,293 MORE »

 Market Share (See Leaders)

The number of benchmark samples for this model as a percentage of all 67,593,187 RAM Kits tested

Custom PC Builder (Start a new build) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE A COMPONENT:

CPU GPU SSD HDD RAM MBD
Typical HMAA2GS6CJR8N-XN 1x16GB Builds (Compare 15,461 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 9%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 75%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 8%
Tree trunk

System: Acer Nitro AN515-57

CPU
Core i5-11400HIntelBench 80%, 35,470 samples9,567x
Core i7-11800HIntelBench 88%, 79,827 samples5,287x
Core i9-11900HIntelBench 89%, 6,494 samples594x
GPU
UHD GraphicsIntelBench 4%, 25,082 samples5,308x
UHD GraphicsIntelBench 7%, 53,008 samples3,087x
RTX 3060 (Laptop)NvidiaBench 90%, 102,706 samples1,870x
SSD
WDC PC SN530 SDBPNPZ-512G-1114 512GBNvmeBench 186%, 8,325 samples4,215x
HFM512GD3JX016N 512GBNvmeBench 244%, 4,593 samples3,830x
KINGSTON OM8PDP3256B-AA1 256GBNvmeBench 158%, 2,168 samples1,229x
RAM
HMAA2GS6CJR8N-XN 1x16GBHynixBench 44%, 4,293 samples1x
EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Popular HMAA2GS6CJR8N-XN 1x16GB systems:

How Fast Is Your RAM? (Bench your build) Size up your PC in less than a minute

Welcome to our PC speed test tool. UserBenchmark will test your PC and compare the results to other users with the same components. You can quickly size up your PC, identify hardware problems and explore the best value for money upgrades.

UserBenchmark of the month

Gaming Desktop ProGaming

How it works

  • - Download and run UserBenchmark
  • - CPU tests include: integer, floating and string
  • - GPU tests include: six 3D game simulations
  • - Drive tests include: read, write, sustained write and mixed IO
  • - RAM tests include: single/multi core bandwidth and latency
  • - SkillBench (space shooter) tests user input accuracy
  • - Reports are generated and presented on userbenchmark.com
  • - Identify the strongest components in your PC
  • - See speed test results from other users
  • - Compare your components to the current market leaders
  • - Explore your best upgrade options with a virtual PC build
  • - Compare your in-game FPS to other users with your hardware
Memory Kit Rankings (Price vs Performance) July 2024 RAM Rankings

We calculate effective RAM speed which measures performance for typical desktop users. Effective speed is adjusted by current cost per GB to yield value for money. Our calculated values are checked against thousands of individual user ratings. The customizable table below combines these factors to bring you the definitive list of top Memory Kits. [RAMPro]

ADVERTISEMENT

Group Test Results

  • Best user rated - User sentiment trumps benchmarks for this comparison.
  • Best value for money - Value for money is based on real world performance.
  • Fastest real world speed - Real World Speed measures performance for typical consumers.

 Comments

Added n/a ago.
Your
opinion?
▲Like ▼Dislike
Ready to retire
Age: 3 years

Speed Comparisons

vs Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB
vs Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB
vs G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB
vs G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3600 C16 2x8GB
vs HyperX Fury DDR4 2133 C14 2x8GB
vs Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 2666 C16 2x8GB
vs G.SKILL Ripjaws 4 DDR4 2400 C14 8x16GB
vs Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 2133 C13 2x8GB
vs G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB

132 Memory Kits (Compared) Thousands of user benchmarks compiled into one comparison list

See how consistently different RAM Kits perform with varying real world conditions. The charts also illustrate overall performance, popularity and rank.

 Frequently Asked Questions

Computer Components FAQ
What is the UBM value for money rating?
What is UBM Effective Speed?
Thunderbolt speed?
Are USB 3.0 cables different?
USB 3.0 vs 2.0 speed difference?
Why buy USB 3.0 today?
USB 3.0 / 4.0 release dates and max speeds?
Graphics Cards
How to force Optimus or Switchable discrete GPUs?
What are the UBM DX11 GPU tests?
What are the UBM DX10 GPU tests?
What are the UBM DX09 GPU tests?
What is the Splatting GPU benchmark?
What is the Gravity (NBody) GPU benchmark?
Memory Kits
What is the RAM value for money rating?
What is the effective RAM speed index?
What is the system memory latency ladder?
ALL FAQs »

 Best User Rated
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $175Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $145
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $389WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $235Nvidia RTX 4070 $499Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $342
Today's hottest
Amazon Ebay
deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
Build Test EFps
Can You Run It?
►
YouTube
*NEW*
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback