Today's hottest deals

HP EliteBook 850 G7 Notebook PC

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 5%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 44%
Speed boat
Workstation
Workstation 5%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing way below expectations (15th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 85 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a below average single core score, this CPU can handle email, web browsing and audio/video playback but it will struggle to handle modern 3D games or workstation tasks such as video editing. Finally, with a gaming score of 48.8%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is below average.
Graphics3.5% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive43.9% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionWindows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.
Sub-optimal background CPU (13%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
19 months ago, 14 months ago.
SystemHP EliteBook 850 G7 Notebook PC  (all builds)
MotherboardHP 8724
Memory7.6 GB free of 16 GB @ 3.2 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit Farben
OSWindows 11
BIOS Date20230104
Uptime0.7 Days
Run DateAug 27 '23 at 10:13
Run Duration114 Seconds
Run User DEU-User
Background CPU 13%

 PC Performing way below expectations (15th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i5-10310U
U3E1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 2.2 GHz, turbo 1.95 GHz (avg)
Performing way below expectations (15th percentile)
48.8% Average
Memory 64.6
1-Core 44.3
2-Core 85
41% 64.6 Pts
4-Core 180
8-Core 280
28% 230 Pts
64-Core 278
17% 278 Pts
Poor: 41%
This bench: 48.8%
Great: 78%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Intel UHD Graphics
HP(103C 8724) 1GB
Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 31.0.101.1999
Performing below expectations (37th percentile)
3.5% Terrible
Lighting 3.9
Reflection 3.3
Parallax 4.3
3% 3.83 fps
MRender 4.7
Gravity 3.9
Splatting 6.1
4% 4.9 fps
Poor: 3%
This bench: 3.5%
Great: 6%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung MZVLB256HAHQ-000H1 256GB
48GB free (System drive)
Firmware: EXD70H1Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 216 153 191 192 166 161 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (0th percentile)
43.9% Average
Read 458
Write 274
Mixed 270
SusWrite 180
66% 296 MB/s
4K Read 21.5
4K Write 8
4K Mixed 9.8
49% 13.1 MB/s
Poor: 106%
This bench: 43.9%
Great: 235%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Hynix HMAA2GS6CJR8N-XN 1x16GB
1 of 2 slots used
16GB SODIMM DDR4 3200 MHz clocked @ 2667 MHz
Performing below potential (6th percentile) - Ensure that the top XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
31.1% Below average
MC Read 13.1
MC Write 10
MC Mixed 9.3
31% 10.8 GB/s
SC Read 8
SC Write 9.5
SC Mixed 8.6
25% 8.7 GB/s
Latency 115
35% 115 ns
Poor: 31%
This bench: 31.1%
Great: 55%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 0: 0P 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
0% 0% 0 57 30 60 15.5" 1280 720 AUOC48A
Typical EliteBook 850 G7 Notebook PC Builds (Compare 448 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 8%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 56%
Gunboat
Workstation
Workstation 7%
Tree trunk

System: HP EliteBook 850 G7 Notebook PC

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark the gold standard for users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $169Nvidia RTX 4060 $295WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $135
Intel Core i5-12400F $111Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $345WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $215Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $350
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback