Lenovo 80WK

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 10%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 60%
Destroyer
Workstation
Workstation 10%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (58th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 42 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 56.5%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is average.
Graphics6.28% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Boot Drive216% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Very high background CPU (35%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU. CPU throttled at 96% by Windows. Ensure maximum processor state is set to 100% via Settings > System > Power & sleep > Additional power settings > Change plan settings > Change advanced power settings > Processor power management > Maximum processor state.
SystemLenovo 80WK  (all builds)
MotherboardLENOVO Provence-5R1
Memory6.6 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.4 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors,
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20170831
Uptime0.5 Days
Run DateNov 04 '17 at 18:56
Run Duration112 Seconds
Run User ARE-User
Background CPU 35%
CPU Throttled 96%

 PC Performing as expected (58th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-7700HQ
U3E1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 2.8 GHz, turbo 2.7 GHz (avg)
Performing below expectations (23rd percentile)
56.5% Above average
Memory 78.9
1-Core 56.1
2-Core 144
55% 92.9 Pts
4-Core 185
8-Core 330
31% 258 Pts
64-Core 343
21% 343 Pts
Poor: 38%
This bench: 56.5%
Great: 73%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Intel HD Graphics 630
Legend(17AA 39D1) 1GB
Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 21.20.16.4550
Performing way above expectations (88th percentile)
6.28% Terrible
Lighting 6.9
Reflection 27.3
Parallax 6.22
6% 13.5 fps
MRender 6.33
Gravity 5.9
Splatting 13.6
8% 8.6 fps
Poor: 3%
This bench: 6.28%
Great: 6%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
ST1000LM035-1RK172 1TB
793GB free
Firmware: EXM03B6Q Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (86th percentile)
94.4% Outstanding
Read 520
Write 495
Mixed 511
114% 509 MB/s
4K Read 32
4K Write 75.1
4K Mixed 29.9
126% 45.6 MB/s
DQ Read 34.7
DQ Write 192
DQ Mixed 26.2
46% 84.5 MB/s
Poor: 79%
This bench: 94.4%
Great: 94%
Samsung PM961 NVMe PCIe M.2 256GB
181GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 4L1Q Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (85th percentile)
216% Outstanding
Read 2,500
Write 989
Mixed 1,264
347% 1,584 MB/s
4K Read 44.7
4K Write 89.2
4K Mixed 36.9
162% 56.9 MB/s
DQ Read 127
DQ Write 170
DQ Mixed 30.3
56% 109 MB/s
Poor: 106%
This bench: 216%
Great: 236%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Samsung M471A1K43CB1-CRC 2x8GB
2 of 2 slots used
16GB SODIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2400 MHz
Performing way below expectations (9th percentile)
56.5% Above average
MC Read 20.8
MC Write 21.4
MC Mixed 20.7
60% 21 GB/s
SC Read 8.3
SC Write 15.2
SC Mixed 12.1
34% 11.9 GB/s
Latency 82.6
48% 82.6 ns
Poor: 50%
This bench: 56.5%
Great: 78%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical 80WK Builds (Compare 7,020 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 11%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 60%
Destroyer
Workstation
Workstation 10%
Tree trunk

System: Lenovo 80WK

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $166Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $150
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $388WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $89
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4070 $520Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $353
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback