Wortmann_ag NJx0MU

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 13%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 63%
Destroyer
Workstation
Workstation 12%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing way below expectations (15th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 85 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 58.6%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is average.
Graphics10% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Boot Drive95.5% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionWindows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.
Very high background CPU (46%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
SystemWortmann_ag NJx0MU  (all builds)
MotherboardClevo NJ50MU
Memory11.3 GB free of 16 GB @ 3.2 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit couleurs
OSWindows 11
BIOS Date20211117
Uptime0 Days
Run DateNov 19 '22 at 15:43
Run Duration113 Seconds
Run User FRA-User
Background CPU 46%

 PC Performing way below expectations (15th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i5-1135G7
U3E1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 2.4 GHz, turbo 2.3 GHz (avg)
Performing way below expectations (7th percentile)
58.6% Above average
Memory 59.7
1-Core 102
2-Core 194
65% 118 Pts
4-Core 316
8-Core 415
46% 366 Pts
64-Core 186
12% 186 Pts
Poor: 57%
This bench: 58.6%
Great: 77%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Intel Iris Xe
Clevo(1558 8683) 1GB
Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 30.0.101.1340
Performing way below expectations (16th percentile)
10% Very poor
Lighting 12.1
Reflection 11.8
Parallax 10.5
10% 11.5 fps
MRender 14
Gravity 11.9
Splatting 12.1
10% 12.7 fps
Poor: 8%
This bench: 10%
Great: 20%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
SSD_M.2_PCIe3_256GB_InnovationIT 256GB
131GB free (System drive)
Firmware: T0918A0L Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 258 305 312 316 199 249 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (7th percentile)
95.5% Outstanding
Read 893
Write 710
Mixed 569
SusWrite 273
136% 611 MB/s
4K Read 29.3
4K Write 93
4K Mixed 13.4
111% 45.2 MB/s
DQ Read 369
DQ Write 152
DQ Mixed 104
118% 208 MB/s
Poor: 96%
This bench: 95.5%
Great: 223%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Samsung M471A1K43DB1-CWE Crucial CT8G4SFRA32A.M8FJ 16GB
3200, 3200 MHz
8192, 8192 MB
Performing below expectations (28th percentile)
69% Good
MC Read 26.1
MC Write 33.8
MC Mixed 21.4
77% 27.1 GB/s
SC Read 8.6
SC Write 15.2
SC Mixed 11.8
34% 11.9 GB/s
Latency 128
31% 128 ns
Poor: 53%
This bench: 69%
Great: 89%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical NJx0MU Builds (Compare 4 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 14%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 75%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 12%
Tree trunk

System: Wortmann_ag NJx0MU

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $166Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $150
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $388WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $89
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4070 $520Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $427
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback