Monster ABRA A5 V17.2

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 10%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 72%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 10%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (48th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 52 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle moderate workstation, and even light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 79.5%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics4.82% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive166% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Run History
SystemMonster ABRA A5 V17.2  (all builds)
MotherboardMONSTER ABRA A5 V17.2
Memory9.8 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.9 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit renk
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20210511
Uptime1.1 Days
Run DateMar 24 '23 at 01:30
Run Duration110 Seconds
Run User TUR-User
Background CPU10%

 PC Performing as expected (48th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i5-11400H
U3E1, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 12 threads
Base clock 2.7 GHz, turbo 4.05 GHz (avg)
Performing as expected (48th percentile)
79.5% Very good
Memory 54.9
1-Core 145
2-Core 260
80% 153 Pts
4-Core 557
8-Core 852
87% 705 Pts
64-Core 995
62% 995 Pts
Poor: 72%
This bench: 79.5%
Great: 87%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Intel UHD Graphics
Clevo(1558 5015) 1GB
Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 31.0.101.4091
Performing way above expectations (87th percentile)
4.82% Terrible
Lighting 5.2
Reflection 116
Parallax 5.8
4% 42.2 fps
MRender 8.7
Gravity 6.2
Splatting 7.1
6% 7.33 fps
Poor: 3%
This bench: 4.82%
Great: 5%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Crucial P2 3D NVMe PCIe M.2 500GB-$55
221GB free (System drive)
Firmware: P2CR031 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 513 169 167 168 388 169 MB/s
Performing as expected (50th percentile)
166% Outstanding
Read 991
Write 1,008
Mixed 925
SusWrite 262
179% 797 MB/s
4K Read 50
4K Write 194
4K Mixed 70.7
269% 105 MB/s
DQ Read 384
DQ Write 887
DQ Mixed 508
423% 593 MB/s
Poor: 47%
This bench: 166%
Great: 253%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Samsung M471A1K43DB1-CWE Crucial CT8G4SFRA32A.M8FJ 16GB
2933, 2933 MHz
8192, 8192 MB
Performing below potential (6th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
53.3% Above average
MC Read 19
MC Write 23.4
MC Mixed 15.8
55% 19.4 GB/s
SC Read 11.7
SC Write 23.1
SC Mixed 12.4
45% 15.7 GB/s
Latency 143
28% 143 ns
Poor: 53%
This bench: 53.3%
Great: 89%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical ABRA A5 V17.2 Builds (Compare 975 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 13%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 76%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 12%
Tree trunk

System: Monster ABRA A5 V17.2

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 56% - Above average Total price: $55
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $171Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $150
Intel Core i5-13600K $270Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $388WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $90
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4070 $520Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $353
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback