Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming 83% Aircraft carrier	Desktop 83% Aircraft carrier	Workstation 91% Nuclear submarine


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing way below expectations (17th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 83 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
Processor	With a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle typical workstation, and even moderate server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 87%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Graphics	98% is a very good 3D score, it's the business. This GPU can handle recent 3D games at high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Memory	64GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 64GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Sub-optimal background CPU (15%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

Motherboard	Gigabyte GA-B460 AORUS PRO AC (all builds)
Memory	44.9 GB free of 64 GB @ 2.7 GHz
Display	1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colori
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20200527
Uptime	1.4 Days
Run Date	Nov 22 '22 at 20:48
Run Duration	137 Seconds
Run User	ITA-User
Background CPU	15%

PC Performing way below expectations (17^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i9-10900K-$410 107,269 User benchmarks, average bench 100% U3E1, 1 CPU, 10 cores, 20 threads Base clock 3.7 GHz, turbo 4.85 GHz (avg) Performing way below expectations (4^th percentile)	87% Excellent	Memory 77.4 1-Core 140 2-Core 245 85% 154 Pts	4-Core 518 8-Core 931 87% 724 Pts	64-Core 1,829 113% 1,829 Pts
Poor: 89% ↑ This bench: 87% Great: 106%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia RTX 3060-$283 447,556 User benchmarks, average bench 100% Gigabyte(1458 4074) CLim: 2160 MHz, MLim: 3750 MHz, Ram: 12GB, Driver: 516.94 Performing below potential (30^th percentile) - GPU OC Guide	98% Outstanding	Lighting 129 Reflection 117 Parallax 114 106% 120 fps	MRender 128 Gravity 94.5 Splatting 90 83% 104 fps
Poor: 90% ↑ This bench: 98% Great: 106%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Transcend TS512GMTE110S 512GB 3,080 User benchmarks, average bench 163% 17GB free (System drive) Firmware: S0905C3 Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete		Read 1,422 Write 1006 Mixed 880 244% 1,103 MB/s	4K Read 33.4 4K Write 146 4K Mixed 25.5 160% 68.1 MB/s	DQ Read 456 DQ Write 763 DQ Mixed 324 326% 514 MB/s
Poor: 98% Great: 240%
Seagate ST2000LM015-2E8174 2TB 39,476 User benchmarks, average bench 51% 307GB free Firmware: SDM1 SusWrite @10s intervals: 74 72 70 70 69 70 MB/s Performing way below expectations (12^th percentile)	34.7% Below average	Read 49.2 Write 65.7 Mixed 47.3 SusWrite 70.9 43% 58.3 MB/s	4K Read 0.6 4K Write 3.4 4K Mixed 0.5 144% 1.5 MB/s
Poor: 31% ↑ This bench: 34.7% Great: 70%
Amd-raid WDC WD40EFAX-68J 4TB 388 User benchmarks, average bench 67% 436GB free Firmware: 83.00A83 SusWrite @10s intervals: 72 31 29 25 26 21 MB/s Performing below expectations (29^th percentile)	45.5% Average	Read 122 Write 113 Mixed 26 SusWrite 34.1 54% 73.9 MB/s	4K Read 0.9 4K Write 6.8 4K Mixed 0.6 230% 2.77 MB/s
Poor: 13% ↑ This bench: 45.5% Great: 110%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Transcend JM2666HLE-32G 2x31.5GB 25 User benchmarks, average bench 89% 2 of 4 slots used 63GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2666 MHz Performing way below expectations (8^th percentile)	70.7% Very good	MC Read 25.4 MC Write 29.6 MC Mixed 23 74% 26 GB/s	SC Read 12.3 SC Write 24.5 SC Mixed 17.6 52% 18.1 GB/s	Latency 85.6 47% 85.6 ns
Poor: 71% ↑ This bench: 70.7% Great: 107%

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

Gaming 128%

UFO

Desktop 93%

Nuclear submarine

Workstation 115%

UFO

SSD
970 Evo NVMe PCIe M.2 500GBSamsung $43Bench 273%, 381,216 samples	33x
970 Evo Plus NVMe PCIe M.2 1TBSamsung $95Bench 310%, 455,997 samples	31x
970 Evo Plus NVMe PCIe M.2 500GBSamsung $43Bench 276%, 367,854 samples	27x

RAM
HyperX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GBKingstonBench 86%, 239,203 samples	37x
Fury 2666 C16 2x8GBHyperX $75Bench 82%, 134,977 samples	25x
TEAMGROUP-UD4-3200 2x8GBUnknownBench 85%, 99,207 samples	23x

Value: 80% - Very good

Total price: $641

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $39	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $32	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16