Asus X99-E

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming
Gaming 43%
Speed boat
Desktop
Desktop 63%
Destroyer
Workstation
Workstation 37%
Jet ski
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (46th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 54 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 60%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics71.3% is a good 3D score. This GPU can handle the majority of recent games at high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot DriveThe boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times.
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
MotherboardAsus X99-E  (all builds)
Memory3.7 GB free of 8 GB @ 1.9 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit färger
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20161108
Uptime0.9 Days
Run DateNov 24 '22 at 19:34
Run Duration124 Seconds
Run User SWE-User
Background CPU8%
Watch Gameplay: 1660S + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing as expected (46th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel @ 1.80GHz
SOCKET 2011, 1 CPU, 8 cores, 16 threads
Base clock 1.8 GHz, turbo 1.9 GHz (avg)
Performing above expectations (69th percentile)
60% Good
Memory 80.5
1-Core 57.1
2-Core 111
52% 83 Pts
4-Core 215
8-Core 380
36% 297 Pts
64-Core 559
35% 559 Pts
Poor: 51%
This bench: 60%
Great: 64%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1660S (Super)-$195
Nvidia(10DE 13D3) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 2115 MHz, MLim: 3500 MHz, Ram: 6GB, Driver: 516.94
Performing below potential (52nd percentile) - GPU OC Guide
71.3% Very good
Lighting 88.7
Reflection 88.8
Parallax 82.7
72% 86.7 fps
MRender 110
Gravity 79.7
Splatting 71.7
69% 87 fps
Poor: 65%
This bench: 71.3%
Great: 76%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016)-$37
886GB free (System drive)
Firmware: CC43
SusWrite @10s intervals: 114 104 144 144 153 149 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (17th percentile)
75.8% Very good
Read 130
Write 135
Mixed 66.8
SusWrite 134
85% 116 MB/s
4K Read 1
4K Write 1.6
4K Mixed 0.8
160% 1.13 MB/s
Poor: 60%
This bench: 75.8%
Great: 113%
Seagate Barracuda 4TB (2017)-$63
3.5TB free
Firmware: 0001
SusWrite @10s intervals: 170 163 167 174 174 174 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - RAM cached drive detected
Poor: 40% Great: 90%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Crucial BLS4G4D240FSB.M8FAD 2x4GB
2 of 8 slots used
8GB DIMM DDR4 1866 MHz clocked @ 1867 MHz
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
53.1% Above average
MC Read 25.2
MC Write 14.6
MC Mixed 18.5
56% 19.4 GB/s
SC Read 10.7
SC Write 10.9
SC Mixed 13.6
34% 11.7 GB/s
Latency 79.7
50% 79.7 ns
Poor: 53%
This bench: 53.1%
Great: 69%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical X99-E Builds (Compare 532 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 84%
Aircraft carrier
Desktop
Desktop 84%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 75%
Battleship

Motherboard: Asus X99-E

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 92% - Outstanding Total price: $398
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $164Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $150
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $89
Intel Core i5-13600K $249Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $369
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback