Asus TUF GAMING X570-PLUS

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 83%
Aircraft carrier
Desktop
Desktop 90%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation
Workstation 85%
Aircraft carrier
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (54th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 46 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle typical workstation, and even moderate server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 87.3%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Graphics93.2% is a very good 3D score, it's the business. This GPU can handle recent 3D games at high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive198% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionWindows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.
Run History
19 months ago, 19 months ago.
MotherboardAsus TUF GAMING X570-PLUS  (all builds)
Memory24.6 GB free of 32 GB @ 2.1 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 11
BIOS Date20221028
Uptime0 Days
Run DateNov 28 '22 at 13:52
Run Duration258 Seconds
Run User GBR-User
Background CPU2%
Watch Gameplay How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing as expected (54th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Ryzen 7 3700X-$177
AM4, 1 CPU, 8 cores, 16 threads
Base clock 3.6 GHz, turbo 4.1 GHz (avg)
Performing above expectations (62nd percentile)
87.3% Excellent
Memory 70.3
1-Core 144
2-Core 284
88% 166 Pts
4-Core 558
8-Core 1,006
94% 782 Pts
64-Core 1,365
84% 1,365 Pts
Poor: 76%
This bench: 87.3%
Great: 94%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD RX 5700-XT-$150
Ram: 8GB, Driver: 22.11.1
Performing below potential (15th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
93.2% Outstanding
Lighting 116
Reflection 137
Parallax 172
94% 142 fps
MRender 114
Gravity 131
Splatting 95.1
91% 113 fps
Poor: 91%
This bench: 93.2%
Great: 104%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Intel 660p NVMe PCIe M.2 1TB-$70
242GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 005C Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 638 270 36 19 120 106 MB/s
Performing above expectations (65th percentile)
198% Outstanding
Read 1,527
Write 1,572
Mixed 1,091
SusWrite 198
245% 1097 MB/s
4K Read 60.6
4K Write 185
4K Mixed 82.9
296% 109 MB/s
DQ Read 636
DQ Write 884
DQ Mixed 471
437% 664 MB/s
Poor: 127%
This bench: 198%
Great: 255%
Micron_5 200_MTFDDAK480TD 480GB
366GB free
Firmware: D1M
SusWrite @10s intervals: 427 432 431 422 424 426 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (100th percentile)
95.4% Outstanding
Read 418
Write 432
Mixed 299
SusWrite 427
89% 394 MB/s
4K Read 28.3
4K Write 91.6
4K Mixed 37.3
139% 52.4 MB/s
DQ Read 246
DQ Write 197
DQ Mixed 218
164% 220 MB/s
Poor: 69%
This bench: 95.4%
Great: 95%
Samsung 840 Evo 250GB-$70
141GB free
Firmware: EXT0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 391 275 276 276 275 274 MB/s
Performing above expectations (67th percentile)
104% Outstanding
Read 510
Write 452
Mixed 416
SusWrite 294
94% 418 MB/s
4K Read 42.6
4K Write 89.3
4K Mixed 51.9
178% 61.3 MB/s
DQ Read 241
DQ Write 196
DQ Mixed 169
140% 202 MB/s
Poor: 64%
This bench: 104%
Great: 118%
Intel SS DSC2BF180A4H 180GB
106GB free
Firmware: LH6i
SusWrite @10s intervals: 160 109 155 159 160 153 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
Poor: 4% Great: 21%
WD WD10EAVS-00D7B1 1TB
210GB free
Firmware: 01.0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 61 63 64 64 63 65 MB/s
Performing below expectations (20th percentile)
34.1% Below average
Read 55.1
Write 59.2
Mixed 41.2
SusWrite 63.3
40% 54.7 MB/s
4K Read 0.6
4K Write 2.3
4K Mixed 0.8
156% 1.23 MB/s
Poor: 26%
This bench: 34.1%
Great: 51%
Seagate Barracuda 6TB (2017)-$140
3.5TB free
Firmware: 0001
SusWrite @10s intervals: 149 163 169 166 156 153 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (96th percentile)
88.4% Excellent
Read 147
Write 150
Mixed 124
SusWrite 159
107% 145 MB/s
4K Read 4.7
4K Write 4.5
4K Mixed 0.8
368% 3.33 MB/s
Poor: 40%
This bench: 88.4%
Great: 87%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Corsair CMK16GX4M2Z3600C18 CM4X8GD3600C18K2D CMK16GX4M2Z3600C18 CM4X8GD3600C18K2D 32GB
2133, 2133, 2133, 2133 MHz
8192, 8192, 8192, 8192 MB
Performing below potential (4th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
66.9% Good
MC Read 26.9
MC Write 18
MC Mixed 26.4
68% 23.8 GB/s
SC Read 21.8
SC Write 17.5
SC Mixed 26.2
62% 21.8 GB/s
Latency 101
40% 101 ns
Poor: 89%
This bench: 66.9%
Great: 123%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical TUF GAMING X570-PLUS Builds (Compare 6,911 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 129%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 94%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation
Workstation 130%
UFO

Motherboard: Asus TUF GAMING X570-PLUS - $188

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 88% - Excellent Total price: $991
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $156Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $150
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $388WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $60
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4070 $520Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $353
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback