Today's hottest deals

Asrock X570 Phantom Gaming X

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 212%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 110%
UFO
Workstation
Workstation 235%
UFO
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (59th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 41 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle intensive workstation, and even full-fledged server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 107%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is outstanding.
Graphics201% is a record breaking 3D score, it's almost off the scale. This GPU can handle all 3D games at very high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive664% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionWindows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.
High background CPU (22%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
MotherboardAsrock X570 Phantom Gaming X  (all builds)
Memory22.7 GB free of 32 GB @ 3.6 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 11
BIOS Date20221019
Uptime0 Days
Run DateNov 29 '22 at 20:34
Run Duration136 Seconds
Run User POL-User
Background CPU 22%

 PC Performing as expected (59th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Ryzen 9 5900X-$215
AM4, 1 CPU, 12 cores, 24 threads
Base clock 3.7 GHz, turbo 4.4 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (94th percentile)
107% Outstanding
Memory 93.6
1-Core 171
2-Core 330
107% 198 Pts
4-Core 648
8-Core 1,244
112% 946 Pts
64-Core 2,239
139% 2,239 Pts
Poor: 87%
This bench: 107%
Great: 108%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia RTX 3090-$1,350
Nvidia(10DE 1454) ≥ 4GB; KFA2 GeForce RTX 3090 SG 24 GB
CLim: 2100 MHz, MLim: 4875 MHz, Ram: 24GB, Driver: 526.98
Performing below potential (23rd percentile) - GPU OC Guide
201% Outstanding
Lighting 291
Reflection 296
Parallax 308
238% 299 fps
MRender 350
Gravity 238
Splatting 187
203% 258 fps
Poor: 185%
This bench: 201%
Great: 230%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 980 Pro NVMe PCIe M.2 2TB-$120
1.5TB free (System drive)
Firmware: 5B2QGXA7 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 65 65 67 73 73 73 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (100th percentile)
664% Outstanding
Read 9,986
Write 72.9
Mixed 139
SusWrite 69.3
533% 2,567 MB/s
4K Read 640
4K Write 4.3
4K Mixed 8.8
983% 218 MB/s
Poor: 278%
This bench: 664%
Great: 508%
Samsung 970 Evo NVMe PCIe M.2 1TB-$100
243GB free
Firmware: 2B2Q Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 518 354 532 582 579 579 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (19th percentile)
254% Outstanding
Read 2,137
Write 2,217
Mixed 1,518
SusWrite 524
358% 1,599 MB/s
4K Read 56.8
4K Write 158
4K Mixed 77.8
269% 97.4 MB/s
DQ Read 1,274
DQ Write 1,116
DQ Mixed 1,181
889% 1,190 MB/s
Poor: 214%
This bench: 254%
Great: 372%
Toshiba X300 4TB-$116
1TB free
Firmware: FP1R
SusWrite @10s intervals: 107 106 107 107 107 106 MB/s
Performing below expectations (25th percentile)
72.7% Very good
Read 146
Write 153
Mixed 64.9
SusWrite 107
86% 118 MB/s
4K Read 2.9
4K Write 2.3
4K Mixed 1.1
286% 2.1 MB/s
Poor: 57%
This bench: 72.7%
Great: 104%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown 3600 C17 Series 4x8GB
4 of 4 slots used
32GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 3600 MHz
Performing way above expectations (95th percentile)
125% Outstanding
MC Read 52.5
MC Write 43.6
MC Mixed 43.3
133% 46.5 GB/s
SC Read 30.8
SC Write 26.7
SC Mixed 41.6
94% 33 GB/s
Latency 60.8
66% 60.8 ns
Poor: 65%
This bench: 125%
Great: 125%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical X570 Phantom Gaming X Builds (Compare 237 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 92%
Nuclear submarine
Desktop
Desktop 95%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation
Workstation 104%
UFO

Motherboard: Asrock X570 Phantom Gaming X

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 91% - Outstanding Total price: $671
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark the gold standard for users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $210Nvidia RTX 4060 $285WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $125
Intel Core i5-12600K $160Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $389WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $80
Intel Core i5-12400F $111Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $330
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback