Today's hottest deals

Asus VivoBook_ASUSLaptop X532FLC_S532FL

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming
Gaming 12%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 71%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 10%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (55th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 45 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle very light workstation, and even some very light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 73.3%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics13.5% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Memory24GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 24GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionWindows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.
Sub-optimal background CPU (16%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
SystemAsus VivoBook_ASUSLaptop X532FLC_S532FL  (all builds)
MotherboardASUSTeK X532FLC
Memory18.1 GB free of 24 GB @ 2.7 GHz
Display504 x 1000 - 32 Bit kolorów, 1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit kolorów
OSWindows 11
BIOS Date20191218
Uptime0 Days
Run DateNov 29 '22 at 20:52
Run Duration181 Seconds
Run User POL-User
Background CPU 16%

 PC Performing as expected (55th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i5-10210U
U3E1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 2.1 GHz, turbo 3.4 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (96th percentile)
73.3% Very good
Memory 78.4
1-Core 118
2-Core 224
78% 140 Pts
4-Core 369
8-Core 524
56% 447 Pts
64-Core 539
33% 539 Pts
Poor: 26%
This bench: 73.3%
Great: 73%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GeForce MX250
Asus(1043 147F) 2GB
Driver: nvldumdx.dll Ver. 30.0.15.1169
Performing above expectations (62nd percentile)
13.5% Very poor
Lighting 16.8
Reflection 14.6
Parallax 14.6
14% 15.3 fps
MRender 15.6
Gravity 16.5
Splatting 16.3
13% 16.1 fps
Poor: 9%
This bench: 13.5%
Great: 16%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Nvme INTEL SSDPEKNW512G8 512GB
190GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 004C Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 1,212
Write 857
Mixed 774
210% 948 MB/s
4K Read 48.5
4K Write 104
4K Mixed 58.2
203% 70.3 MB/s
DQ Read 307
DQ Write 333
DQ Mixed 339
250% 326 MB/s
Poor: 67% Great: 207%
WDC WDS100T1R0B-68A4Z0 1TB
904GB free
Firmware: 411000WR
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 428
Write 373
Mixed 355
86% 385 MB/s
4K Read 33.5
4K Write 72.3
4K Mixed 29.4
127% 45.1 MB/s
DQ Read 322
DQ Write 307
DQ Mixed 185
174% 271 MB/s
Poor: 73% Great: 119%
Qnap iSCSI Storage 644GB
600GB free
Firmware: 4.0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 9 9.5 7.5 9.2 9.8 10 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (7th percentile)
3.47% Terrible
Read 1
Write 10
Mixed 3
SusWrite 9.2
4% 5.8 MB/s
4K Read 5.8
4K Write 0
4K Mixed 0
242% 1.93 MB/s
Poor: 3%
This bench: 3.47%
Great: 49%
Samsung Flash Drive FIT 128GB
106GB free, PID 1000
Operating at USB 3.1 Speed
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 332
Write 61.1
Mixed 83.5
150% 159 MB/s
4K Read 12.6
4K Write 23
4K Mixed 2.5
914% 12.7 MB/s
DQ Read 16.3
DQ Write 25.9
DQ Mixed 3
1,043% 15.1 MB/s
Poor: 10% Great: 105%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Micron 4ATS1G64HZ-2G6E1 Kingston KF2666C15S4/16G 24GB
2667, 2667 MHz
8192, 16384 MB
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
56.4% Above average
MC Read 20.7
MC Write 20.6
MC Mixed 17.4
56% 19.6 GB/s
SC Read 14.5
SC Write 21.9
SC Mixed 18.7
52% 18.4 GB/s
Latency 83.6
48% 83.6 ns
Poor: 56%
This bench: 56.4%
Great: 57%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical VivoBook_ASUSLaptop X532FLC_S532FL Builds (Compare 104 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 10%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 59%
Gunboat
Workstation
Workstation 10%
Tree trunk

System: Asus VivoBook_ASUSLaptop X532FLC_S532FL

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark the gold standard for users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $165Nvidia RTX 4060 $295WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $135
Intel Core i5-12400F $111Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $389WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $85
Intel Core i5-13600K $200Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $350
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback