Today's hottest deals

Asus TUF GAMING B460M-PLUS (WI-FI)

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming
Gaming 68%
Battle cruiser
Desktop
Desktop 88%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 67%
Battle cruiser
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (28th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 72 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle typical workstation, and even moderate server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 92.8%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is excellent.
Graphics74.6% is a good 3D score. This GPU can handle the majority of recent games at high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Memory32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
MotherboardAsus TUF GAMING B460M-PLUS (WI-FI)  (all builds)
Memory23.9 GB free of 32 GB @ 2.1 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20210115
Uptime2.1 Days
Run DateNov 30 '22 at 01:10
Run Duration123 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU5%

 PC Performing below expectations (28th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-10700KF-$216
LGA1200, 1 CPU, 8 cores, 16 threads
Base clock 3.8 GHz, turbo 4.65 GHz (avg)
Performing below expectations (25th percentile)
92.8% Outstanding
Memory 82.6
1-Core 143
2-Core 279
92% 168 Pts
4-Core 552
8-Core 907
89% 730 Pts
64-Core 1,410
87% 1,410 Pts
Poor: 85%
This bench: 92.8%
Great: 104%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia RTX 3050-$243
CLim: 2130 MHz, MLim: 3500 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 526.98
Performing below potential (66th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
74.6% Very good
Lighting 101
Reflection 83
Parallax 88
82% 90.7 fps
MRender 83.7
Gravity 72.5
Splatting 64.7
59% 73.6 fps
Poor: 68%
This bench: 74.6%
Great: 78%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
WDC WDBNCE5000PNC 500GB
3GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 401120RL
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 473
Write 417
Mixed 286
87% 392 MB/s
4K Read 33.6
4K Write 100
4K Mixed 28.3
140% 54.1 MB/s
DQ Read 386
DQ Write 193
DQ Mixed 188
167% 256 MB/s
Poor: 69% Great: 115%
Hitachi HDS723020BLA642 2TB-$80
388GB free
Firmware: MN6OA5C0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 99 100 103 101 102 100 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (13th percentile)
48.9% Average
Read 69.4
Write 78.2
Mixed 48.5
SusWrite 101
54% 74.2 MB/s
4K Read 0.9
4K Write 2
4K Mixed 0.9
174% 1.27 MB/s
Poor: 40%
This bench: 48.9%
Great: 85%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Corsair CMK16GX4M2B3200C16 CMK16GX4M2D3600C18 CMK16GX4M2B3200C16 CMK16GX4M2D3600C18 32GB
2133, 2133, 2133, 2133 MHz
8192, 8192, 8192, 8192 MB
Performing way below expectations (7th percentile)
63.8% Good
MC Read 23
MC Write 24.8
MC Mixed 19.3
64% 22.4 GB/s
SC Read 13.7
SC Write 25.6
SC Mixed 20
56% 19.8 GB/s
Latency 75.8
53% 75.8 ns
Poor: 64%
This bench: 63.8%
Great: 113%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical TUF GAMING B460M-PLUS (WI-FI) Builds (Compare 3,828 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 137%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 96%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation
Workstation 134%
UFO

Motherboard: Asus TUF GAMING B460M-PLUS (WI-FI) - $120

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 84% - Excellent Total price: $886
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $170Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $135
Intel Core i5-12400F $112Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $380WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $75
Intel Core i5-13600K $248Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $350
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback