Asus TUF GAMING B560M-PLUS WIFI

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming
Gaming 0%
Incomplete
Desktop
Desktop 0%
Incomplete
Workstation
Workstation 0%
Incomplete
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (31st percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 69 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle typical workstation, and even moderate server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 94.6%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is excellent.
Graphics151% is an outstanding 3D score, it's the bee's knees. This GPU can handle almost all 3D games at very high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Memory40GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 40GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionWindows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.
Run History
19 months ago, 19 months ago.
MotherboardAsus TUF GAMING B560M-PLUS WIFI  (all builds)
Memory23.7 GB free of 40 GB @ 2.1 GHz
Display2560 x 1440 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 11
BIOS Date20211028
Uptime0.1 Days
Run DateNov 30 '22 at 14:24
Run Duration183 Seconds
Run User VNM-User
Background CPU2%

 PC Performing below expectations (31st percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i5-11400F-$112
LGA1200, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 12 threads
Base clock 2.6 GHz, turbo 4.1 GHz (avg)
Performing above expectations (64th percentile)
94.6% Outstanding
Memory 89.6
1-Core 144
2-Core 270
93% 168 Pts
4-Core 535
8-Core 855
85% 695 Pts
64-Core 1,094
68% 1,094 Pts
Poor: 88%
This bench: 94.6%
Great: 101%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia RTX 3070-Ti-$429
CLim: 2130 MHz, MLim: 4750 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 526.98
Performing below potential (20th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
151% Outstanding
Lighting 214
Reflection 217
Parallax 215
174% 215 fps
MRender 252
Gravity 164
Splatting 134
144% 183 fps
Poor: 139%
This bench: 151%
Great: 170%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung MZVLB256HBHQ-00007 256GB
31GB free (System drive)
Firmware: EXH7
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 1,970
Write 1,835
Mixed 1,324
380% 1,710 MB/s
4K Read 58.2
4K Write 154
4K Mixed 74.9
266% 95.9 MB/s
DQ Read 1,012
DQ Write 1,118
DQ Mixed 1,156
845% 1,095 MB/s
Poor: 107% Great: 252%
Gigabyte GP-AG41TB 1TB
756GB free
Firmware: EGFM13.0
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 2,216
Write 3,382
Mixed 2,203
585% 2,600 MB/s
4K Read 45
4K Write 214
4K Mixed 83.6
289% 114 MB/s
DQ Read 1,460
DQ Write 1,284
DQ Mixed 1,342
1,014% 1,362 MB/s
Poor: 191% Great: 473%
Seagate ST12000NM001G-2M 12TB
11TB free
Firmware: DN01
Relative performance n/a - benchmarks incomplete
Read 28,733
Mixed 140
10,320% 14,437 MB/s
4K Read 32.2
4K Write 5
4K Mixed 1.3
1,579% 12.8 MB/s
Poor: 18% Great: 113%
SDXC Card 64GB
59GB free, PID null
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 36.5
Write 33.6
Mixed 30.6
42% 33.6 MB/s
4K Read 5.7
4K Write 3
4K Mixed 3.8
252% 4.17 MB/s
Poor: 7% Great: 41%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Corsair CMK8GX4M1E3200C16 Kingston KHX2666C16D4/16GX CMK16GX4M1E3200C16 40GB
2133, 2667, 2133 MHz
8192, 16384, 16384 MB
Performing below potential (10th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
57.4% Above average
MC Read 19.8
MC Write 20
MC Mixed 18
55% 19.3 GB/s
SC Read 19.4
SC Write 20.6
SC Mixed 19.9
57% 20 GB/s
Latency 67.8
59% 67.8 ns
Poor: 57%
This bench: 57.4%
Great: 79%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical TUF GAMING B560M-PLUS WIFI Builds (Compare 6,935 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 97%
Nuclear submarine
Desktop
Desktop 99%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation
Workstation 89%
Aircraft carrier

Motherboard: Asus TUF GAMING B560M-PLUS WIFI

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 105% - Outstanding Total price: $507
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $166Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $150
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $388WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $89
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4070 $520Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $353
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback