MSI MPG X570 GAMING PLUS (MS-7C37)

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 107%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 93%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation
Workstation 122%
UFO
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (51st percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 49 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle typical workstation, and even moderate server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 86.5%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Graphics122% is an outstanding 3D score, it's the bee's knees. This GPU can handle almost all 3D games at very high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive168% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory48GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 48GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionWindows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.
SystemMicro-Star MS-7C37
MotherboardMSI MPG X570 GAMING PLUS (MS-7C37)  (all builds)
Memory29.8 GB free of 48 GB @ 2.4 GHz
Display3840 x 2160 - 32 Bit색
OSWindows 11
BIOS Date20190628
Uptime0 Days
Run DateJul 05 '23 at 15:13
Run Duration225 Seconds
Run User JPN-User
Background CPU0%
Watch Gameplay: 2070S + 3700X How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing as expected (51st percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Ryzen 9 3900X-$375
AM4, 1 CPU, 12 cores, 24 threads
Base clock 3.8 GHz, turbo 4.1 GHz (avg)
Performing as expected (42nd percentile)
86.5% Excellent
Memory 73.9
1-Core 140
2-Core 274
88% 163 Pts
4-Core 531
8-Core 919
88% 725 Pts
64-Core 2,128
132% 2,128 Pts
Poor: 80%
This bench: 86.5%
Great: 97%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia RTX 2070S (Super)-$210
Zotac(19DA 6510) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 2130 MHz, MLim: 3500 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 522.06
Performing way above expectations (95th percentile)
122% Outstanding
Lighting 161
Reflection 158
Parallax 159
131% 159 fps
MRender 191
Gravity 137
Splatting 121
119% 150 fps
Poor: 105%
This bench: 122%
Great: 123%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Crucial P2 3D NVMe PCIe M.2 1TB-$99
655GB free (System drive)
Firmware: P2CR033 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 1613 793 237 242 95 61 MB/s
Performing below expectations (29th percentile)
168% Outstanding
Read 1,100
Write 1,674
Mixed 1,228
SusWrite 507
255% 1,127 MB/s
4K Read 48
4K Write 114
4K Mixed 64.6
216% 75.6 MB/s
DQ Read 706
DQ Write 457
DQ Mixed 665
473% 609 MB/s
Poor: 84%
This bench: 168%
Great: 299%
Samsung 970 Evo Plus NVMe PCIe M.2 500GB-$69
409GB free
Firmware: 2B2QEXM7 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 1499 1206 833 834 832 830 MB/s
Performing as expected (54th percentile)
274% Outstanding
Read 2,423
Write 1,714
Mixed 1,677
SusWrite 1,006
380% 1705 MB/s
4K Read 64.4
4K Write 110
4K Mixed 79.3
257% 84.5 MB/s
DQ Read 1,137
DQ Write 468
DQ Mixed 716
553% 773 MB/s
Poor: 178%
This bench: 274%
Great: 346%
Seagate Barracuda 4TB (2017)-$63
3.5TB free
Firmware: 0001
SusWrite @10s intervals: 155 165 163 144 149 139 MB/s
Performing above expectations (79th percentile)
79.2% Very good
Read 124
Write 147
Mixed 54.9
SusWrite 152
87% 119 MB/s
4K Read 0.9
4K Write 0.6
4K Mixed 0.1
60% 0.53 MB/s
Poor: 40%
This bench: 79.2%
Great: 90%
Seagate ST12000NM001G-2M 12TB
5TB free
Firmware: SN03
SusWrite @10s intervals: 49 50 47 49 62 62 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (8th percentile)
18.1% Very poor
Read 10.2
Write 40.4
Mixed 3.2
SusWrite 53
19% 26.7 MB/s
4K Read 0
4K Write 0.6
4K Mixed 0
11% 0.2 MB/s
Poor: 18%
This bench: 18.1%
Great: 113%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown TEAMGROUP-UD4-3200 Micron AFLD416FS1P TEAMGROUP-UD4-3200 Micron AFLD416FS1P 48GB
2400, 2400, 2400, 2400 MHz
8192, 16384, 8192, 16384 MB
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
75.3% Very good
MC Read 29.1
MC Write 26.8
MC Mixed 27.5
79% 27.8 GB/s
SC Read 19.4
SC Write 16.1
SC Mixed 23.8
56% 19.8 GB/s
Latency 92.8
43% 92.8 ns

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical MPG X570 GAMING PLUS (MS-7C37) Builds (Compare 10,602 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 129%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 94%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation
Workstation 130%
UFO

Motherboard: MSI MPG X570 GAMING PLUS (MS-7C37) - $179

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 88% - Excellent Total price: $977
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $171Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $150
Intel Core i5-13600K $270Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $388WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $90
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4070 $520Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $353
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback