PC Status | Overall this PC is performing below expectations (33rd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 67 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas. |
Processor | With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle light workstation, and even some light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 64.1%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average. |
Graphics | 29% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics) |
Boot Drive | 52.2% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications. |
Memory | 32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing. |
OS Version | Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option. |
System | HP Z620 Workstation (all builds) |
Motherboard | Hewlett-Packard 158A |
Memory | 27.1 GB free of 32 GB @ 1.3 GHz |
Display | 1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit kolorów |
OS | Windows 10 |
BIOS Date | 20180710 |
Uptime | 0 Days |
Run Date | Nov 30 '22 at 20:22 |
Run Duration | 115 Seconds |
Run User | DEU-User |
Background CPU | 2% |
Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).
Processor | Bench | Normal | Heavy | Server |
---|---|---|---|---|
![]() 1st CPU: Intel Xeon E5-2640 0
CPU0, 2 CPU, 12 cores, 24 threads
Base clock 2.5 GHz, turbo 2.8 GHz (avg)
|
64.1%
Good
|
59% 99.8 Pts
|
48% 401 Pts
|
66% 1,064 Pts
|
Graphics Card | Bench | 3D DX9 | 3D DX10 | 3D DX11 |
---|---|---|---|---|
![]() Nvidia GTX 1050-Ti-$59
Asus(1043 85D3) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 1961 MHz, MLim: 1752 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 512.15
Performing below potential (59th percentile) - GPU OC Guide |
29%
Poor
|
30% 40.5 fps
|
28% 34.6 fps
|
|
Drive | Bench | Sequential | Random 4k | Deep queue 4k |
---|---|---|---|---|
![]() Adata Ultimate SU800 256GB-$72
44GB free (System drive)
Firmware: Q0518BS
SusWrite @10s intervals: 117 109 76 79 67 51 MB/s
|
52.2%
Above average
|
60% 272 MB/s
|
72% 22.3 MB/s
|
118% 150 MB/s
|
Memory Kit | Bench | Multi core | Single core | Latency |
---|---|---|---|---|
![]() Samsung M392B1K70CM0-YH9 4x8GB
4 of 12 slots used
32GB DIMM DDR3 clocked @ 1333 MHz
Performing below potential (9th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP |
43.8%
Average
|
47% 16.4 GB/s
|
22% 7.6 GB/s
|
44% 91.4 ns
|
L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
|
---|---|
CPU: Intel Xeon E5-2620 01stBench 55%, 2,873 samples | 153x |
Xeon E5-1620 0Intel $345Bench 70%, 17,464 samples | 152x |
CPU: Intel Xeon E5-2690 01stBench 68%, 2,388 samples | 131x |
![]() |
|
---|---|
Quadro K4000NvidiaBench 13%, 11,114 samples | 174x |
Quadro K2000NvidiaBench 7%, 13,526 samples | 113x |
Quadro 2000NvidiaBench 6%, 15,855 samples | 96x |
EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER |