Today's hottest deals

ECS H61H2-M2

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming
Gaming 10%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 61%
Destroyer
Workstation
Workstation 8%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (61st percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 39 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 56.3%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is average.
Graphics14.8% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Boot DriveThe boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times.
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Very high background CPU (41%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
MotherboardECS H61H2-M2  (all builds)
Memory5 GB free of 8 GB @ 1.3 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit cores
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20120907
Uptime0.3 Days
Run DateDec 03 '22 at 01:08
Run Duration122 Seconds
Run User BRA-User
Background CPU 41%

 PC Performing above expectations (61st percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i3-3220-$92
SOCKET 0, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 3.3 GHz, turbo 3.3 GHz (avg)
Performing above expectations (73rd percentile)
56.3% Above average
Memory 81.8
1-Core 76.3
2-Core 135
60% 97.6 Pts
4-Core 179
8-Core 190
24% 185 Pts
64-Core 191
12% 191 Pts
Poor: 38%
This bench: 56.3%
Great: 62%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 750-$120
Zotac(19DA 2346) 1GB
CLim: 1306 MHz, MLim: 1250 MHz, Ram: 1GB, Driver: 516.94
Performing above expectations (74th percentile)
14.8% Very poor
Lighting 17.9
Reflection 23.4
Parallax 16.6
15% 19.3 fps
MRender 23.1
Gravity 18.5
Splatting 15.3
15% 19 fps
Poor: 13%
This bench: 14.8%
Great: 16%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung HD502HJ 500GB-$50
406GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 1AJ10001
SusWrite @10s intervals: 45 105 90 122 137 129 MB/s
Performing as expected (56th percentile)
61.6% Good
Read 110
Write 132
Mixed 69.6
SusWrite 105
76% 104 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 3.3
4K Mixed 1.2
224% 1.73 MB/s
Poor: 30%
This bench: 61.6%
Great: 77%
WD Blue 2.5" 1TB (2004)-$38
476GB free
Firmware: 01.01A01
SusWrite @10s intervals: 73 71 74 72 74 72 MB/s
Performing below expectations (39th percentile)
40.7% Average
Read 69
Write 73.4
Mixed 44.1
SusWrite 72.7
48% 64.8 MB/s
4K Read 0.5
4K Write 1.8
4K Mixed 0.9
154% 1.07 MB/s
Poor: 23%
This bench: 40.7%
Great: 62%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Kingston 99U5471-012.A00LF MMXIV 8GB
1333, 1333 MHz
4096, 4096 MB
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
46.6% Average
MC Read 16.5
MC Write 16.8
MC Mixed 14.6
46% 16 GB/s
SC Read 13.5
SC Write 15.4
SC Mixed 13.3
40% 14.1 GB/s
Latency 77.3
52% 77.3 ns
Poor: 47%
This bench: 46.6%
Great: 49%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical H61H2-M2 Builds (Compare 696 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 5%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 49%
Yacht
Workstation
Workstation 4%
Tree trunk

Motherboard: ECS H61H2-M2 - $125

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 62% - Good Total price: $199
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark the gold standard for users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $210Nvidia RTX 4060 $280WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $135
Intel Core i5-12600K $159Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $389WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $84
Intel Core i5-12400F $111Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $370
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback