Intel. To Be Filled By O.E.M.

Performance Results


Gaming 19% Surfboard	Desktop 69% Battle cruiser	Workstation 15% Surfboard


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing as expected (42nd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 58 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 63.9%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics	26% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	50.3% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory	4GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 4GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS Version	Windows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.

Very high background CPU (42%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

Run History

19 months ago, 18 months ago, 18 months ago, 18 months ago.

System	Intel Thurley
Motherboard	Intel. To Be Filled By O.E.M. (all builds)
Memory	3.9 GB free of 4.00391 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display	Цвета: 1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit
OS	Windows 11
BIOS Date
Uptime	0.3 Days
Run Date	Dec 03 '22 at 19:54
Run Duration	127 Seconds
Run User	RUS-User
Background CPU	42%

PC Performing as expected (42^nd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Xeon E5540 486 User benchmarks, average bench 63% CPU 1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads Base clock 2.55 GHz, turbo 2.65 GHz (avg) Performing as expected (55^th percentile)	63.9% Good	Memory 89.7 1-Core 65.5 2-Core 111 57% 88.8 Pts	4-Core 210 8-Core 287 32% 249 Pts	64-Core 281 17% 281 Pts
Poor: 50% ↑ This bench: 63.9% Great: 72%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1050-$101 269,381 User benchmarks, average bench 26% Gigabyte(1458 372D) CLim: 1936 MHz, MLim: 1752 MHz, Ram: 2GB, Driver: 526.47 Performing below potential (73^rd percentile) - GPU OC Guide	26% Poor	Lighting 32.8 Reflection 34.4 Parallax 32.3 27% 33.2 fps	MRender 37.2 Gravity 32.8 Splatting 23.1 24% 31 fps
Poor: 24% ↑ This bench: 26% Great: 28%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Apacer AS350 256GB 5,875 User benchmarks, average bench 70% 179GB free (System drive) Firmware: U0309A0 SusWrite @10s intervals: 147 91 165 108 61 52 MB/s Performing below potential (14^th percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable	50.3% Above average	Read 243 Write 223 Mixed 229 SusWrite 104 45% 200 MB/s	4K Read 26.9 4K Write 50 4K Mixed 17.6 90% 31.5 MB/s	DQ Read 154 DQ Write 190 DQ Mixed 31.1 63% 125 MB/s
Poor: 38% ↑ This bench: 50.3% Great: 100%
WD Blue 1TB (2012)-$37 3,105,054 User benchmarks, average bench 83% 51GB free Firmware: 13057113 SusWrite @10s intervals: 85 89 113 127 131 131 MB/s Performing below expectations (24^th percentile)	71.3% Very good	Read 136 Write 142 Mixed 75.6 SusWrite 113 85% 116 MB/s	4K Read 1.3 4K Write 2.3 4K Mixed 1.1 219% 1.57 MB/s
Poor: 52% ↑ This bench: 71.3% Great: 109%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Samsung M393B5170DZ1-CF8 Winbond W25X/Q32 40GB 3 User benchmarks, average bench 37% 1600, 33 MHz 4096, 36864 MB Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples	36.3% Below average	MC Read 13.4 MC Write 11.6 MC Mixed 11.5 35% 12.2 GB/s	SC Read 9.4 SC Write 8.9 SC Mixed 9.8 27% 9.37 GB/s	Latency 67.6 59% 67.6 ns
Poor: 36% ↑ This bench: 36.3% Great: 37%

Take a copy of your results How to check your in-game FPS

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical To Be Filled By O.E.M. Builds (Compare 4 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 19%

Surfboard

Desktop 69%

Battle cruiser

Workstation 15%

Surfboard

Motherboard: Intel. To Be Filled By O.E.M.

CPU
Xeon E5540IntelBench 63%, 486 samples	3x
000IntelBench 68%, 2 samples	1x

GPU
GTX 1050Nvidia $101Bench 26%, 269,381 samples	2x
RX 580AMD $130Bench 52%, 360,351 samples	1x
GTX 750Nvidia $120Bench 15%, 66,662 samples	1x

SSD
AS350 256GBApacerBench 70%, 5,875 samples	3x

RAM
M393B5170DZ1-CF8 Winbond W25X/Q32 40GBSamsungBench 37%, 3 samples	3x
HMT151R7TFR4C-H9 Winbond W25X/Q32 40GBHynixBench 38%, 11 samples	1x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 60% - Above average

Total price: $101

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $171	Nvidia RTX 4060 $293	WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $150
Intel Core i5-13600K $270	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $388	WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $90
Intel Core i5-12400F $110	Nvidia RTX 4070 $520	Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $353