Intel. To Be Filled By O.E.M.

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 20%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 70%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 15%
Surfboard
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (32nd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 68 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 64.2%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics26.3% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive44.2% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory4GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 4GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionWindows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.
Very high background CPU (31%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
SystemIntel Thurley
MotherboardIntel. To Be Filled By O.E.M.  (all builds)
Memory5.1 GB free of 4.00391 GB @ 1.6 GHz
DisplayЦвета: 1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit
OSWindows 11
BIOS Date
Uptime0 Days
Run DateDec 18 '22 at 11:47
Run Duration141 Seconds
Run User RUS-User
Background CPU 31%

 PC Performing below expectations (32nd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Xeon E5540
CPU 1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 2.55 GHz, turbo 2.65 GHz (avg)
Performing as expected (55th percentile)
64.2% Good
Memory 90.4
1-Core 66.7
2-Core 129
60% 95.4 Pts
4-Core 209
8-Core 289
32% 249 Pts
64-Core 286
18% 286 Pts
Poor: 50%
This bench: 64.2%
Great: 72%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1050-$101
CLim: 1936 MHz, MLim: 1752 MHz, Ram: 2GB, Driver: 527.56
Performing below potential (73rd percentile) - GPU OC Guide
26.3% Poor
Lighting 33.1
Reflection 34.3
Parallax 32.9
27% 33.4 fps
MRender 37.6
Gravity 33.4
Splatting 23.4
25% 31.5 fps
Poor: 24%
This bench: 26.3%
Great: 28%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Apacer AS350 256GB
150GB free (System drive)
Firmware: U0309A0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 151 163 120 71 69 18 MB/s
Performing below potential (10th percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable
44.2% Average
Read 242
Write 209
Mixed 218
SusWrite 98.7
43% 192 MB/s
4K Read 13
4K Write 53.4
4K Mixed 17.7
71% 28 MB/s
DQ Read 125
DQ Write 189
DQ Mixed 30.8
59% 115 MB/s
Poor: 38%
This bench: 44.2%
Great: 100%
Seagate Momentus Thin 5400.9 2.5" 500GB-$21
286GB free
Firmware: 0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 24 29 29 29 30 30 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (14th percentile)
23.9% Poor
Read 54.7
Write 27.6
Mixed 23.3
SusWrite 28.3
25% 33.5 MB/s
4K Read 1
4K Write 0.3
4K Mixed 0.6
114% 0.63 MB/s
Poor: 11%
This bench: 23.9%
Great: 61%
WD Blue 1TB (2012)-$37
11GB free
Firmware: 13057113
SusWrite @10s intervals: 91 105 108 122 132 108 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (10th percentile)
59.4% Above average
Read 95.6
Write 103
Mixed 71.9
SusWrite 111
70% 95.3 MB/s
4K Read 1.2
4K Write 2.4
4K Mixed 1.1
217% 1.57 MB/s
Poor: 52%
This bench: 59.4%
Great: 109%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Samsung M393B5170DZ1-CF8 Winbond W25X/Q32 40GB
1600, 33 MHz
4096, 36864 MB
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
36.7% Below average
MC Read 13.5
MC Write 11.7
MC Mixed 11.5
35% 12.2 GB/s
SC Read 9.3
SC Write 8.8
SC Mixed 10.8
28% 9.63 GB/s
Latency 66.6
60% 66.6 ns
Poor: 36%
This bench: 36.7%
Great: 37%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical To Be Filled By O.E.M. Builds (Compare 4 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 19%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 69%
Battle cruiser
Workstation
Workstation 15%
Surfboard

Motherboard: Intel. To Be Filled By O.E.M.

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 60% - Above average Total price: $101
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $171Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $150
Intel Core i5-13600K $270Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $388WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $90
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4070 $520Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $353
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback