Asrock FM2A88M Extreme4+

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 14%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 68%
Battle cruiser
Workstation
Workstation 11%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (72nd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 28 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 59.2%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is average.
Graphics19.9% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive59.6% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
MotherboardAsrock FM2A88M Extreme4+  (all builds)
Memory5.4 GB free of 8 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display3840 x 2160 - 32 Bit Farben
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20160205
Uptime0.4 Days
Run DateNov 08 '17 at 08:02
Run Duration198 Seconds
Run User DEU-User
Background CPU7%

 PC Performing above expectations (72nd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Athlon II X4 760K (2013 D.Ri)-$59
CPUSocket, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 4.4 GHz, turbo 4 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (90th percentile)
59.2% Above average
Memory 82
1-Core 75.8
2-Core 131
59% 96.4 Pts
4-Core 213
8-Core 214
28% 213 Pts
64-Core 210
13% 210 Pts
Poor: 39%
This bench: 59.2%
Great: 61%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 750-Ti-$92
CLim: 1471 MHz, MLim: 1387 MHz, Ram: 2GB, Driver: 387.92
Performing way above expectations (100th percentile)
19.9% Very poor
Lighting 24.9
Reflection 19.5
Parallax 22.9
20% 22.4 fps
MRender 28.2
Gravity 25.3
Splatting 19
19% 24.2 fps
Poor: 16%
This bench: 19.9%
Great: 19%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
INTENSO 128GB
79GB free (System drive)
Firmware: S8FM04.6 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s
Performing below expectations (39th percentile)
59.6% Above average
Read 478
Write 185
Mixed 261
67% 308 MB/s
4K Read 20.8
4K Write 73.3
4K Mixed 7.7
80% 33.9 MB/s
DQ Read 135
DQ Write 165
DQ Mixed 21.5
52% 107 MB/s
Poor: 35%
This bench: 59.6%
Great: 91%
WD Red 1TB (2012)-$85
931GB free
Firmware: 82.00A82 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (100th percentile)
96.8% Outstanding
Read 189
Write 148
Mixed 152
122% 163 MB/s
4K Read 0.96
4K Write 2.53
4K Mixed 0.3
120% 1.26 MB/s
Poor: 43%
This bench: 96.8%
Great: 87%
WD Red 1TB (2012)-$85
658GB free
Firmware: 82.00A82 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (100th percentile)
96.1% Outstanding
Read 191
Write 144
Mixed 150
121% 162 MB/s
4K Read 0.79
4K Write 2.19
4K Mixed 0.23
99% 1.07 MB/s
Poor: 43%
This bench: 96.1%
Great: 87%
WD Blue 500GB (2010)-$23
210GB free
Firmware: 15.01H15 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s
Performing above expectations (64th percentile)
59.3% Above average
Read 105
Write 101
Mixed 109
80% 105 MB/s
4K Read 0.72
4K Write 1.98
4K Mixed 0.48
120% 1.06 MB/s
Poor: 24%
This bench: 59.3%
Great: 69%
Toshiba 2.5"External Har 500GB
6GB free, PID 0b1f
Operating at USB 3.0 Speed
Performing above expectations (66th percentile)
27.1% Poor
Read 74.9
Write 54.6
Mixed 49.8
72% 59.8 MB/s
4K Read 0.48
4K Write 1.37
4K Mixed 0.25
57% 0.7 MB/s
Poor: 11%
This bench: 27.1%
Great: 37%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown F3-1600C11-4GNS Micron 8JTF51264AZ-1G6E1 8GB
1600, 1600 MHz
4096, 4096 MB
Performing below potential (14th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
24.8% Poor
MC Read 10.5
MC Write 4.9
MC Mixed 7.4
22% 7.6 GB/s
SC Read 9.1
SC Write 6.2
SC Mixed 8.5
23% 7.93 GB/s
Latency 76.8
52% 76.8 ns
Poor: 25%
This bench: 24.8%
Great: 57%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical FM2A88M Extreme4+ Builds (Compare 90 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 9%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 50%
Yacht
Workstation
Workstation 8%
Tree trunk

Motherboard: Asrock FM2A88M Extreme4+ - $93

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 41% - Average Total price: $375
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $160Nvidia RTX 4060 $290WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $160
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $388WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $79
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4070 $520Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $353
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback