Today's hottest deals

HP 500-377nf

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 7%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 58%
Gunboat
Workstation
Workstation 6%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (21st percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 79 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 61.6%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics1.86% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive35.2% is low SSD score. With a better SSD this system will boot faster, make applications more responsive and reduce IO wait times.
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
High background CPU (26%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
21 months ago, 21 months ago.
SystemHP 500-377nf  (all builds)
MotherboardHewlett-Packard 2AF7
Memory4.9 GB free of 8 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit couleurs
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20140718
Uptime0 Days
Run DateDec 06 '22 at 17:44
Run Duration122 Seconds
Run User FRA-User
Background CPU 26%

 PC Performing below expectations (21st percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i5-4460S
SOCKET 0, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 2.9 GHz, turbo 3 GHz (avg)
Performing below expectations (24th percentile)
61.6% Good
Memory 77.6
1-Core 87
2-Core 167
64% 111 Pts
4-Core 265
8-Core 266
36% 265 Pts
64-Core 281
17% 281 Pts
Poor: 54%
This bench: 61.6%
Great: 73%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GeForce GT 620
Sapphire(174B 0620) 1GB
CLim: 810 MHz, MLim: 350 MHz, Ram: 1GB, Driver: 376.54
Performing below expectations (25th percentile)
1.86% Terrible
Lighting 2.2
Reflection 2.9
Parallax 0.6
2% 1.9 fps
MRender 2.9
Gravity 2.4
Splatting 2.1
2% 2.47 fps
Poor: 2%
This bench: 1.86%
Great: 3%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Fanxiang S101 256GB
135GB free (System drive)
Firmware: V0414A0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 5.8 50 7 30 194 5.4 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (14th percentile)
35.2% Below average
Read 472
Write 415
Mixed 373
SusWrite 48.8
73% 327 MB/s
4K Read 31.1
4K Write 5.2
4K Mixed 0.3
50% 12.2 MB/s
Poor: 30%
This bench: 35.2%
Great: 98%
Seagate Barracuda 7200.14 1TB-$23
928GB free
Firmware: HP51
SusWrite @10s intervals: 47 47 44 47 46 47 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - benchmarks incomplete
Read 3,744
Write 4
Mixed 7.7
SusWrite 46.2
679% 950 MB/s
4K Read 140
4K Mixed 0.2
8,777% 70 MB/s
Poor: 55% Great: 112%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Samsung M378B5173DB0-CK0 Micron CT51264BD160B.C16F 8GB
1600, 1600 MHz
4096, 4096 MB
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
54.4% Above average
MC Read 19.1
MC Write 21.1
MC Mixed 17.2
55% 19.1 GB/s
SC Read 14.5
SC Write 17
SC Mixed 17.6
47% 16.4 GB/s
Latency 85
47% 85 ns
Poor: 51%
This bench: 54.4%
Great: 54%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical 500-377nf Builds (Compare 15 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 12%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 67%
Battle cruiser
Workstation
Workstation 11%
Tree trunk

System: HP 500-377nf

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 38% - Below average Total price: $150
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $170Nvidia RTX 4060 $285WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $146
Intel Core i5-12400F $112Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $375WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $75
Intel Core i5-13600K $245Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $350
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback